An ecstatic PhD Graduand is hugged by her equally overjoyed father shortly after receiving her award during Day 2 of the 70th Graduation Ceremony, 15th January 2020, Freedom Square, Makerere University, Kampala Uganda.
Last weekend I drove home to see my mother and other relatives. I decided to just be present to them without touching my phone and getting involved in other things except them. I realised that I came back happier than the past many times when I am home. I am sure they were happy too. Most times when I go home, I am involved in many things and spending little time to be physically and emotionally present to my mother and relatives. Most nations, communities and people are obsessed with money, religion, education, good health, peace and security, thinking that those things will give them happiness. At the end of the day, most are shocked to find that this is farther from the truth. Several studies have shown that true happiness arises from only these two things:
A STRONG SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND
REGULAR, ENTHUSIASTIC COMMUNITY CELEBRATION.
Societal relationships promote positive feelings. People are happy when they trust each other and can celebrate as a community. Most of us yearn for comfort. These studies tell us that, believe it or not, a better standard of living does not translate into happiness. Take the example of the1950s. One gets a feeling that people were not happy. They were happier then despite having less.
Being the richest, smartest, cutest, in themselves do not guarantee happiness, and neither should the absence of these make one feel unfulfilled. What is important is to cultivate loving relationships. Don’t make TV and radio adverts make you feel less of yourself. You are great even without the best house and car. These should not validate and define you.
The hallmark of psychological health is happiness. We should endeavor to create a strong sense of community everywhere we are like at work, the community where we live, where we pray from, etc. and take part in a community celebration. Growing up in the village, I remember how the whole community would converge when there was a cry for help in one home upon hearing the drumbeat, Ggwanga mujje–“you should all convene to help tackle this problem”. Our homes had no fences but we felt secure. The workplaces were communal and so were the churches.
Friends, I wish to implore you to read the recent encyclical letter that has been written by Pope Francis entitled Fratelli Tutti which translates “On the fraternity and social friendship.” One doesn’t have to be catholic to read it. This document summarizes what religion, different studies and disciplines have discovered about happiness. Religion, psychology, sociology, medicine, economics, environmental science and other disciplines agree on what makes people happy. If you go religious you can summarise happiness research as love of self and love of neighbour, not in words but in action. May we all be happy.
Happy Independence Day.
Henry Nsubuga Manager, Counselling and Guidance Centre, Plot 106, Mary Stuart Road (Opposite Mary Stuart Hall), Makerere University Email: hnsubuga[at]cgc.mak.ac.ug Tel: +256-772-558022
Health experts from across Africa have called for stronger use of routine health data in planning, supervision and service delivery, noting that although countries are generating large amounts of health information, much of it is still not being used.
The call came during a webinar hosted by the Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH) in partnership with The Global Fund under the theme “From National Dashboards to District Action: Strengthening Subnational Data Use for Planning, Supervision and Service Delivery.”
The webinar brought together health information specialists, policymakers and practitioners from Uganda, Kenya, Zimbabwe and Ethiopia to share experiences and lessons on using subnational data for evidence based decision making.
Kenya’s journey from data collection to action
In her keynote address, Dr Helen Kiarie, Head of the Monitoring and Evaluation Division at Kenya’s Ministry of Health, urged health practitioners and policymakers to move beyond routine reporting and use data to improve health outcomes.
Dr Helen Kiarie, Head of the Monitoring and Evaluation Division at Kenya’s Ministry of Health, delivers a keynote presentation.
“The bottleneck is no longer collecting data. It is turning routine data into decisions and decisions into action,” Dr Kiarie said.
Drawing on Kenya’s experience, she pointed to the country’s shift from paper based reporting systems to digital platforms, noting that more than 95% of public health facilities have been digitised.
According to Dr Kiarie, Kenya has developed National Data Analytics Guidelines to support evidence based decision making across the health system. The guidelines set out a structured approach to data analysis, interpretation and dissemination so that the information generated can be used.
She said building a culture of data use requires leadership that asks for evidence, regular performance reviews, public dashboards, mentorship programmes, and the integration of data into planning and budgeting.
Community data improving maternal health
Dr Kiarie gave practical examples of how data can shape health outcomes.
In Kwale County, community health promoters used household level data to identify and follow up pregnant women, encouraging them to attend antenatal care services and deliver at health facilities.
As a result, skilled birth attendance increased from 50 per cent in 2022 to 85 per cent, while reported home deliveries fell from 808 to 248.
She also pointed to Kenya’s efforts to link digital health data with health financing systems, saying better documentation and data quality have strengthened accountability and increased reimbursements to health facilities.
She added that real time maternal and perinatal death surveillance systems are helping health authorities identify gaps in care, assign responsibility and take corrective action to prevent avoidable deaths.
“Data has moved beyond documenting losses to becoming an instrument for preventing the next avoidable death,” Dr Kiarie said.
Addressing data quality challenges
Despite major investments in digital health systems, Dr Kiarie acknowledged that data quality challenges remain.
She cited system downtimes, the parallel use of paper and digital records, limited access to some digital platforms, and resistance to change among some health workers as barriers to data quality and use.
Still, she said Kenya’s data quality has improved considerably through digitisation and continued investment in governance, analytics capacity and quality assurance.
Regional experiences and lessons
The webinar also included a panel discussion with experts from Uganda, Zimbabwe and Ethiopia, who shared experiences on strengthening data use at district and facility level.
The discussion pointed to the importance of strong leadership, timely information, digital infrastructure and feedback mechanisms that help health workers and managers make informed decisions with the data available.
Participants agreed that health information systems should do more than serve as reporting tools. They should also support decision making where services are delivered.
Moving from information to impact
Speaking during the webinar, Prof. Rhoda Wanyenze, Dean of Makerere University School of Public Health (MAKSPH), commended countries for progress in strengthening health information systems and encouraging data use.
She urged practitioners and researchers to go beyond documenting challenges and start capturing examples of how data informed decisions are improving programmes and health outcomes.
“It would be really good for us to dig deeper in terms of what decisions we have actually made and what we would not have known or done differently if we did not have the data,” she said.
In his closing remarks, Dr Wodimu Ayele of The Global Fund said the value of data lies in its ability to improve service delivery, inform decision making and strengthen accountability.
He called on countries to keep investing in data quality, analytics capacity and health information systems, while making sure evidence generated at all levels leads to measurable improvements in health outcomes.
Uganda has released the preliminary findings of the 2025 Uganda Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (UPHIA 2025), a national household survey that provides a current picture of the country’s HIV response and selected non-communicable disease indicators.
At the Uganda Media Centre today, 1 October 2026, the Minister of Health, Hon. Dr Chris Baryomunsi, released the preliminary results and said the evidence would guide policy, resource allocation and service improvement, with particular attention to people and communities with the greatest gaps. He urged Ugandans to know their HIV status, use prevention services and, when diagnosed, start treatment promptly and adhere to it.
Hon. Dr. Chris Baryomunsi.
Among adults aged 15 years and above, HIV prevalence was 5.9 percent, including 7.3 percent among women and 4.1 percent among men. Among adults aged 15–64, prevalence was also 5.9 percent, unchanged from 2020/21. Across the country, prevalence ranged from 1.3 percent in Karamoja to 8.0 percent in the South Western region. Of adults living with HIV, 85.3 percent knew their status; 99.1 percent of those aware were on treatment; and 96.5 percent of those on treatment had achieved viral load suppression. HIV-status awareness remains the central gap in the 95-95-95 cascade.
The survey also measured selected non-communicable disease indicators for the first time. Elevated blood pressure affected 15.5 percent of adults, while 24.8 percent had overweight or obesity and 0.9 percent had raised blood glucose.
L-R: Dr. Mary Boyd, Dr. Chris Baryomunsi, Prof. Charles Olaro and Prof. Rhoda Wanyenze.
Conducted from July to September 2025, UPHIA 2025 was the first population-based HIV impact assessment to be fully country-led. The Ministry of Health provided overall leadership, while Makerere University School of Public Health served as the prime implementing organisation, working with UVRI, UBOS, regional referral hospitals and local governments. PEPFAR funded the survey through the U.S. CDC.
Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH), on behalf of the WIN-WIN in the Wetlands for Climate Resilience project, invites eligible organisations to submit proposals for selection as the Implementing Partner responsible for designing and delivering a community-based urban wetland restoration and sustainable livelihood intervention in the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area (GKMA).
This is an open, competitive Call for Proposals (CfP). In line with good practice for evidence-generation projects, this CfP intentionally does not prescribe the restoration model, livelihood package, or implementation methodology. Applicants are instead invited to propose their own technically sound, innovative, and locally appropriate approach in response to the problem statement, objectives and outcomes set out in the attached Terms of Reference (ToR). The selection process will be conducted in two stages: (1) a short Concept Note stage, open to all eligible applicants, and (2) a Full Proposal stage, open only to organisations shortlisted at Concept Note stage.
Key details:
What: Selection of an Implementing Partner for Community-Based Urban Wetland Restoration and Sustainable Livelihood Development
Reference No.: MakSPH/WIN-WIN/CfP/2026/01
Who can apply: Registered NGOs/CSOs, CBOs/cooperatives, private firms or social enterprises, or consortia of these
Where: Urban and peri-urban wetland communities in Wakiso, Mukono, and Mpigi districts (Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area)
Concept Note deadline: 16 October 2026, 5:00 PM (EAT)
Submission: winwinwetlands@musph.ac.ug, subject line “WIN-WIN CfP – [Applicant Organisation Name]”