In advance of the World Health Summit Regional Meeting, we spoke with the Dean of Makerere University School of Public Health about how researchers and academics build trust and gain influence with decision makers
Ahead of this year’s World Health Summit Regional Meeting, we spoke with Dr. Rhoda Wanyenze, the Dean of Makerere University School of Public Health, about the theme of this year’s event – bridging the science-to-policy gap for global health.
Dr. Rhoda Wanyenze, who has collaborated with government health officials to develop evidence-based policies from HIV to COVID-19 and maternal and child health, said that researchers and policymakers can, among other things, “interpret the data together, make sure the interpretation is appropriate, and tease out the actions they’re going to take.”
Dr. Wanyenze, who is also a principal investigator for Exemplars in Global Health’s COVID-19 research, added: “Let the primary focus not just be the publication [of the research], but also, responding to [policymakers] needs and giving them information that they can use.”
Across sub-Saharan Africa, research institutions have been partnering with policymakers to help inform policy decisions for decades. For example, the Infectious Diseases Research Institute in Uganda and the Uganda Virus Research Institute supported the Ministry of Health through the COVID-19 pandemic and recent Ebola outbreak. In fact, during the 2022 Ebola epidemic, the Uganda Virus Research Institute repurposed some of its research laboratories to support the government’s disease response and diagnostics efforts.
Many of the continent’s universities, including the School of Public Health at the University of Kinshasa, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences in Tanzania, the Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar, and the University of Zimbabwe, also have strong collaborative relationship with health officials. The University of Zimbabwe, for example, embeds some of its students within the country’s Ministry of Health.
The Makerere University School of Public Health has a similar track record of partnering with and helping inform policymakers in Uganda. To explore how researchers and academics can establish mutually beneficial relationships with policymakers ahead of the World Health Summit Regional Meeting on April 13 in Washington, D.C., Dr. Wanyenze offered her thoughts in an interview
Researchers often struggle to identify the best moment to reach out to policymakers. What does your experience tell you?
Dr. Wanyenze: You don’t wait until you’ve conceptualized the questions, then go to them when you are at the tail-end or when you are presenting the findings. After you present, they’ll ask, Did you also do this?’ And you’ll say, “No, I didn’t.’ And then they’ll ask, ‘Did you also do that?’ And you’ll say, ‘No, I didn’t do that either.’ Sometimes I find that we make a lot of assumptions about what they need to know. Before we even begin to craft our research questions, we need to understand what they’re struggling with and ensure that we are aligned to their needs as we gather evidence.
I’ll give you an example: several years ago, we were beginning to work out how we can move from traditional HIV testing methods to self-testing. We were working on designing a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of this. We had to speak with the Ministry of Health to understand: what is it that they worry about? What is it that would make them not want to adopt this policy?
We also didn’t have just the [Ugandan] Ministry of Health, we had other stakeholders, including people living with HIV, women living with HIV, and we could hear their voices loudly. ‘People will fight. We shall have divorces. We shall have violence.’ We had to think through carefully, if we are going to do this trial, we have to have sufficient mechanisms to deal with potential risks.
At the same time, we must collect this information in a bit more detail so that at the end of the day, we are not just saying, ‘This trial works,’ but we are saying, ‘It won’t cause harm, or if it causes harm, this is how you can mitigate it.’ We had to carefully do this trial with sufficient safety nets to respond to these issues. We had to think about the referral resources, for example, should we have any violence.
Then they told us, ‘We want to know the cost.’ Initially, we had not planned to include costing, but we had to integrate something that can support them to be able to make that decision.
Another example is research my team did on the impact of COVID on maintaining essential health services in Uganda. We presented to the Ministry of Health and its partners our proposed objectives and selected disease indicators to track in the maintenance of essential health services. They informed us that other partners were already working on some of the indicators such as HIV, TB, and maternal health. Rather than duplicate these indicators, they advised us to focus on other indicators which had not been addressed. We agreed to reorient the focus with the resources we had, to harmonize our work with other partners and ensure responsiveness to the needs of the Ministry of Health. Later, when the EHS continuity committee published updated guidelines on maintaining essential health services, it included recommendations based on our research.
How do you manage policymakers’ shifting needs and incorporate their feedback throughout the lifetime of your research?
Dr. Wanyenze: Interim feedback loops are critical to being sensitive to their needs. The challenge is you might not be funded to do everything they ask you to do, but sometimes you find things that are easy to integrate without necessarily spending much. It might involve a few more questions that you can address, with the resources that you have, and produce additional evidence that is needed by the ministry. The benefits are tremendous. By engaging them, they develop a sense of ownership. So that they feel, ‘This is our research.’ And they actually begin to say, ‘When are you giving us the results?’
How should researchers think about reporting out their results to policymakers?
Dr. Wanyenze: Working with policymakers through interpreting the implications of your work is really important. It can help when planning how to disseminate the work so that it is more meaningful.
For one project funded by the Global Fund – a partnership to enhance analytical capacity and data use in Eastern and Southern Africa called PERSuADE – we prioritized the areas for analysis with the Ministry of Health and then we worked with their teams and generated the evidence they needed. Then we were able to track what actions they’ve taken based on the findings.
If you work with the Ministry of Health and any other partners and you use their data or involve them in the data collection, analysis and interpretation, make sure that you include them as co-authors. A common challenge we have experienced is researchers who work with the ministries and other stakeholders publishing the findings without including them as authors or even informing them and sharing the findings.
How do things change if you are working with routine data the government collects?
Dr. Wanyenze: If you are working with data that the government routinely collects, you need to be engaged with policymakers in terms of how you’re going to use that data and that you are actually going to add value and do a good quality analysis that will help them answer their questions. Also, you need to be clear that you will not use their data for anything else without their permission. Sometimes researchers will get this data and they’re flying off and doing other things than what was originally agreed upon. And before you know it, they’ve published it without the government knowing. You need to ensure trust and a partnership that’s respectful.
What advice do you have for research organizations that currently do not have a relationship with the government but want to develop one. How can they establish a mutually beneficial and respectful relationship?
Dr. Wanyenze: Whether you want to work with a ministry of health or an NGO, the process is the same. You need to engage with them to clarify the partnership and expectations. There has to be benefit to the ministry or the NGO to want to work with you. The benefit often will be that you’re generating evidence that will add value to their decisions in a timely manner. You need to be responsive to their needs, to the extent possible.
How can researchers balance the need for quality research, which takes time, and the needs of policymakers, who often have pressing and time-sensitive needs.
Dr. Wanyenze: Timeliness is very important, but it should not compromise quality of the research. Sometimes the research takes long, and researchers will share their findings with policymakers when the findings have been overtaken by events and are no longer relevant. We sometimes prioritize some of their most critical questions and share preliminary findings as we finalize analyses for the rest of the study objectives and papers. Holding back the dissemination until the papers are written is a missed opportunity—we lose the opportunity for feedback from stakeholders to enhance the interpretation of the findings and to use the findings.
Makerere University proudly celebrates the recognition of Mr. Mordecai Tayebwa, Senior Grants Manager, Makerere University Lung Institute and Ms. Bonny Tusiime, Grants and Contracts Officer, Makerere University College of Health of Sciences (MakCHS) as recipients of the prestigious Future of the Field Award of Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI), an international recognition that Honors emerging leaders making outstanding contributions to the advancement of research administration. This year’s ‘Future of the Field’ honorees were formally recognized at SRAI’s Annual Meeting held in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA in October, 2026.
The Future of the Field Award recognizes professionals who demonstrate exceptional leadership, innovation, and commitment to strengthening research management and administration. The award celebrates individuals whose work is shaping the future of the profession by improving research support systems, fostering collaboration, and advancing excellence in research administration.
At Makerere University, Mr. Tayebwa and Ms. Tusiime have played key roles in strengthening grants and contracts management, supporting researchers throughout the grant lifecycle, promoting compliance with sponsor requirements, and contributing to the development of sustainable research management systems. Their efforts have enhanced institutional capacity to attract, manage, and administer competitive research funding while ensuring accountability and excellence. Commenting on the recognition, the award recipients expressed their gratitude for the opportunity to contribute to the growth of research administration. “This recognition reflects not only our individual efforts but also the collaborative environment at MakCHS and Makerere University. It inspires us to continue strengthening research administration and supporting researchers in generating impactful scientific discoveries that improve lives.” They said.
The achievement highlights the growing international recognition of research administration professionals in Africa and underscores Makerere University and MakCHS’s general commitment to building strong research support systems that enable world-class research. This also reflects the institution’s investment in professional development and its dedication to advancing research excellence through effective grants management.
Commenting on the award, Dara C. Little, President, (SRAI) said “In a field as dynamic and rapidly evolving as research administration, the need for visionary,adaptable leaders have never been greater,” . “SRAI’s Future of the Field recipients represent the next generation of changemakers – those who will not only navigate complexity but shape the future of our profession. To embrace change, is to lead your innovation, resilience, and leadership are exactly what this moment demands. Rise to the opportunity and you will do great things!”
Makerere University congratulates Mr. Mordecai Tayebwa and Ms. Bonny Tusiime on this significant achievement and wishes them continued success as they contribute to shaping the future of research administration both regionally and globally
Prof. David Guwatudde, Principal Investigator (centre), and Dr. Justine Bukenya with researchers and stakeholders at the ARISE-NUTRINT dissemination meeting in Iganga, 1 October 2026.
Adolescence is a consequential period for health, when diets, behaviours and other risks can form and persist into adulthood. In Mayuge District, new evidence from Makerere University School of Public Health is showing how some of these early vulnerabilities could contribute to the later risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and what can change when interventions begin early.
The evidence comes from the ARISE-NUTRINT project, a three-year EU-funded study led by Prof. David Guwatudde and Dr. Justine Bukenya. The project examines health and behavioural risks among adolescents and young adults, with a particular focus on nutrition-related NCD risks, and tests interventions designed to improve nutrition fluency and diet quality.
The work comes against a substantial NCD burden in a country where 73.2% of the population is below 30. WHO estimates that NCDs accounted for 42.2% of deaths in Uganda in 2023, while the country’s latest national NCD risk-factor survey found significant risk factors persisting in the population, with little overall change from the previous survey in 2014. Together, the evidence strengthens the case for prevention much earlier in life.
“There is strong evidence from literature demonstrating that most behavioral NCD risk factors, including nutrition-related, are established during childhood, persisting into adulthood. This may lead to development of actual NCDs if such risks are not reversed early,” Prof. Guwatudde said.
The study, he explained, linked assessment of young people’s health risks with developing responses suited to their circumstances. Since enrolling 1,206 participants aged 10–24 in Mayuge District in March 2024, the team has conducted three annual rounds of data collection, with young people and local stakeholders also helping evaluate interventions to reduce the risks identified.
Prof. David Guwatudde (right) addresses stakeholders alongside the ARISE-NUTRINT study team in Iganga on 1 October 2026.
A problem that starts early
The findings, shared with community and district stakeholders in Iganga on October 1, 2026, show that some vulnerabilities were already evident at baseline. Nearly one in three participants had anaemia, 49% had low nutrition literacy, while about one in ten reported symptoms of anxiety and a similar proportion reported depressive symptoms.
Anaemia, a condition in which the blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells or haemoglobin to carry adequate oxygen around the body, was highest among the youngest participants. Overall, 375, or 31%, had anaemia, rising to 35.7 per cent among 10–14-year-olds, compared with 18.9% among those aged 15–19 and 10.6 per cent among young adults aged 20–24.
Nutrition presented another challenge. At baseline, 49% of participants had low nutrition literacy and 13% had poor overall diet quality. Low nutrition literacy was associated with more than four times the odds of poor diet quality.
Gaps also emerged in sexual and reproductive health knowledge and behaviour. About 14 per cent of participants did not know that HIV cannot be transmitted by sharing food with a person living with HIV, 10% believed a condom could be used more than once, and 13 per cent did not know pregnancy could occur during first sexual intercourse. Among 168 participants who reported having had sex, more than half reported using no method to prevent pregnancy during their first or most recent sexual intercourse.
Mental health findings added another dimension. Anxiety symptoms were reported by 10 per cent of participants, depressive symptoms by 9.5% and loneliness by 6.3 per cent. Among 534 participants aged 13–24 assessed for suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported suicidal thoughts.
Together, the baseline findings show that vulnerabilities extended beyond any single health issue. For nutrition, the study went further to examine what shaped everyday food choices and whether those influences could be changed.
Nutrition literacy goes beyond knowing which foods are healthy. It includes understanding nutrition information and applying it to everyday choices. The study found those choices were also shaped by parents, peers, food vendors, culture, prices, seasons, and what was available locally. Improving diets, therefore, required reaching beyond individual knowledge to the households and communities where food choices are made.
What early action changed
The baseline evidence informed the Adolescent Nutrition Fluency Intervention. Working with adolescents and young adults, caregivers, Community Health Workers (CHWs), district teams and other stakeholders, the project adapted nutrition messages to local foods, language and household realities. Ten trained CHWs delivered nine monthly household sessions covering balanced diets, physical activity, vitamins and minerals, meal planning and anaemia prevention.
The household approach reached young people in and out of school. The nutrition literacy, diet-quality and intervention analyses form part of the PhD research of Mr. Thomas Buyinza, supported through ARISE-NUTRINT. At endline, participants who received the sessions recorded higher nutrition literacy and overall diet-quality scores.
“The improvement in nutrition literacy and diet quality suggests that practical education, grounded in local foods and household realities, can support healthier choices among adolescents and young adults. In addition, involving parents and caregivers is important because they influence what families buy, prepare, and eat,” Dr. Bukenya said.
She stressed that nutrition education needed to be complemented by better access to affordable, nutritious foods. Dr. Bukenya also called for continued follow-up, including the use of nutrition and dietary data from DHIS2, to assess whether improvements were maintained and guide district planning.
Dr. Justine Bukenya emphasises family involvement in nutrition education and access to affordable, nutritious foods during the ARISE-NUTRINT dissemination meeting in Iganga on 1 October 2026.
Changes in other outcomes were mixed. Participants reporting no physical activity fell from 22.6% to 7.4%, while those active on four to seven days a week increased from 46% to 54.8%. But activity duration did not improve: those reporting more than 60 minutes a day declined from 28.2% to 21.1%. Underweight fell modestly from 6.2% to 5%, while overweight and obesity did not change significantly.
Anaemia recorded the largest change, falling from 31.1% before the intervention to 9.9% afterwards. During the intervention period, participants received weekly iron and folic acid supplementation and deworming alongside nutrition education on iron-rich foods, dietary diversity and practices that improve iron absorption.
Illustration of the ARISE-NUTRINT household approach: ten trained community health workers delivered nine monthly nutrition education sessions to adolescents and young adults, involving parents and caregivers. AI-generated illustration.
Mayuge District’s Assistant District Health Officer, Ms. Elizabeth Kawaala, said the findings reflected problems recognised locally and highlighted the need for a response involving families and other stakeholders.
“There is a serious challenge that needs to be tackled with many stakeholders, with parents at the centre because these are children. We also learnt that many parents, I think, lack the skills to communicate with their adolescents,” she said.
Mayuge District’s Assistant District Health Officer, Ms. Elizabeth Kawaala, speaks during the dissemination of ARISE-NUTRINT study findings in Iganga on 1 October 2026.
She said the findings had been shared with colleagues and described integrating health education and sensitisation into services. She also called for departments to use the evidence when planning activities in their workplans.
Beyond Mayuge
Seen alongside Uganda’s 2023 STEPS survey, the Mayuge findings add an earlier-life dimension to the national evidence. Makerere University School of Public Health contributed to both studies, with Prof. Guwatudde contributing to the national STEPS survey and now leading ARISE-NUTRINT. While STEPS found significant NCD risk factors persisting among adults, ARISE-NUTRINT shows that some behaviours and vulnerabilities relevant to later NCD risk are already evident during adolescence and young adulthood. The Mayuge research goes further by testing what can change when interventions begin during this period.
The findings leave Mayuge with more than a measure of the problem. They show where vulnerabilities are emerging, what changed when interventions were introduced and where challenges remain. For ARISE-NUTRINT, the evidence now turns attention to which approaches can be sustained and how lessons from Mayuge can inform efforts to support healthier transitions from adolescence into adulthood.
Makerere University School of Public Health invites applications for a PhD fellowship under the Wellcome Trust-supported NETOMA study, which examines the coexistence of health worker shortages and unemployment among qualified health professionals in Africa.
The successful candidate will undertake doctoral research involving ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative analysis of health workers’ professional identities, employment experiences and livelihoods. Applicants should hold a Master’s degree in Anthropology, Sociology, Development Studies, Political Economy or a closely related discipline, with training in qualitative research methods.