Health
Researchers Design Community-led Behavioural Change Model to Control Rate of Type 2 Diabetes among Rural Population
Published
4 years agoon

By Joseph Odoi
Globally the proportion of undiagnosed diabetes is high, standing at 46.5%. In high-income regions like Europe, of all persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), 39.3% are undiagnosed. Low-income countries in Africa have the highest prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, estimated at 66.7%. In Uganda alone, a steady increase in the number of diabetes cases has been observed.
Despite the increasing burden of diabetes in the country, little is known about the socio-cultural norms influencing type 2 diabetes risky behaviors, especially in rural areas to inform action.
In the bid to contribute to data driven interventions, Makerere University researchers with funding from Government of Uganda and Makerere University Research and Innovations Fund (Mak-RIF) carried out a study to understand the patterns of socio-cultural norms in two high incidence districts namely, Busia and Bugiri, in Eastern Uganda.
As part of this study, researchers engaged various health stakeholders who shared their experiences about behaviors factors influencing type two diabetes.
It is upon that background that researchers co-designed a contextual strategy to ensure behavioral change to limit type two diabetes among the rural population under the project titled; “Socio-cultural norms influencing Type 2 Diabetes risks Behaviours – an exploratory to intervention co-design innovative study in two high incidence districts of eastern Uganda”. The strategy was developed by a team of researchers led by Dr. Juliet Kiguli, a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences at the School of Public Health, Makerere University.
According to Dr. Kiguli, despite evidence confirming a high rate of T2D in Uganda, there is hardly any innovation that speaks to the deep rooted causes of Type 2 Diabetes hence the justification for their new model.
‘’There is enough evidence in Uganda at the national and local/community level confirming a high rate of T2DM, compared to the measures/innovations that try to address the disease. We can argue with confidence that most of the research around T2DM in Uganda and Africa has been largely academic and hasn’t been translated into action at a comparable pace of disease incidence and prevalence. Additionally, since the T2DM is largely a lifestyle disease that is influenced by external factors, exposure and social constructs, the solution to T2DM needs to be socially constructed, and currently, there is no innovation that speaks to the deep rooted causes of T2DM – this is the reason why we designed an evidence based innovation that is socially constructed to address diabetes with prevention in mind too‘’she explained of the model
The Assistant Commissioner Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs) at Ministry of Health, Dr. Gerald Mutungi who participated in the study’s innovation co-design had this to say;
“This study is unique, I have learnt many things which I had never looked at from a perspective of social norms and I am glad that we are already designing an innovation together with the community stakeholders and influencers to mitigate and reduce T2DM”.
He also tasked researchers to give answers on why people doing their daily activities and living a normal lifestyle still get diabetes.
Approaches behind the model
As part of the behavioral change strategy, the research team came up with the following approaches to their community-led behavior change model.
- T2DM organized diffusion messaging and practices
This approach of the model will work through community-level social networks and will be used to conduct myths bursting sessions, building new positive social norms and spreading them using social networks related to the norm. This approach will be complemented by deliberation and reflection methodologies and the intent is to create shared commitments to change negative and/or maladaptive risky behaviors around T2DM.
- Community-leader-initiated behavior modeling for T2DM
Because of power, control and therefore influence, this approach will target political leaders, religious leaders, cultural leaders, informal community leaders and all individuals with influence to model, demonstrate and promote the recommended behaviors and practices. This will be the first level of establishing reference groups and this approach will complement other approaches.
- T2DM Non-conforming trendsetters and positive deviants.
In the co-design process, evidence shows the existence of trendsetters and positive deviants who are willing and able to be the first movers in initiating positive normative change around T2DM risky behaviors. Their nonconformity to the social norms around T2DM will contribute to the erosion of strong perceptions in favor of the negative gendered social norms that facilitate entrenchment of T2DM risky behaviors. This approach will be complemented by creation of new risky-behavior-specific reference groups that are able to enact alternative social sanctions against T2DM risky behaviors.
On timing of this model, Mr. Ramadhan Kirunda who was key in innovating the model noted that evidence from the social-norms study revealed a disconnect between the health system and the social system constructs at community and family level, yet T2DM risky behaviors are gendered and influenced by power, control and sanction around submission.
‘’Social norms are responsible for the harmful constructions of dominant masculinity engineered by power and control over women, hence the social-cultural acceptance of inferiority on the part of women. Therefore, even on matters of diet, women have to submit and follow what men prefer, and can become violent in asserting their dominance if women don’t comply. It is important to note that while gender-injustice related consequences affect mostly women, gendered social norms undermine the health and wellbeing of all people, regardless of age, sex, gender, or income setting. Therefore, our proposed model is informed by this reality, it is inclusive by design since it was co-designed together with all community stakeholders/duty bearers and targets risky behaviors that accelerate T2DM, but also other health outcomes.
KEY FINDINGS FROM THE SOCIAL NORMS STUDY
The main behavioral factors influencing type 2 diabetes were a) consuming processed and added sugar products, b) consuming high cholesterol fatty foods, c) excessive alcoholism, d) smoking (traditional and contemporary), e) mental/psychosocial stress and f) lack of exercise. The analysis shows that dietary factors contribute the greatest threat to the fight against type 2 diabetes in Busia and Bugiri according to the researchers.
In terms of social norm strength around dietary factors, the two strongest norms were “people who don’t prepare fried food are poor people”, “taking tea without adding sugar is mistreatment to your husband” and “Bwita/kalo is our staple food, we eat it daily”. Some of the less strong norms included; “eating greens is mistreatment to your man/husband”, “fat people especially men are respected in the community”, and “A true Samia meal must contain meat or fish daily” said one of the study participants
The strongest social norms around alcoholism.The strongest social norms around alcoholism were “alcohol takes away negative thoughts and stress”, “when you take alcohol with your friends, they can’t abandon you”, “Waragi reduces diabetes because it is sour”, “religion does not allow us to take alcohol” explained one of the key informants.
The social norms around smoking included; “if you want to feel good, you have to smoke”, “most old people and our grandparents lived long and were smokers” and “traditional religion demands and allows smoking of pipes, it’s part of our culture”. Affirmed another study participant
The main social norm around physical exercise was that “men are expected to rest/lie down and wait to be served by women”. They have to sit and wait for food’’ added a participant
On drivers that support norm entrenchment, the researchers outlined easy access to alcohol, gender based violence, cultural set up, poverty, wrong peers, poor parenting, one sided food systems as areas that need serious attention.
MORE ABOUT THE STUDY
The study used Social Norms Exploration Tools (SNET). It was conducted in Eastern region in the districts of Bugiri and Busia in December, 2020. This study covered a total of 4 health facility catchment areas: Bugiri Hospital, Nakoma H/C IV, Masafu Hospital and Lumino H/C III.
A number of data collection methods were used including Focus Group Discussions. Key Informant Interviews, In-depth Interviews, Observation and Photography.
This study builds on previous studies funded by Swedish Embassy and conducted in Iganga and Mayuge by the School of Public Health’s Prof. Guwatudde David, Dr. Barbara Kirunda, Dr. Elizabeth Ekirapa, Dr. Roy Mayega and Prof. Buyinza Mukadasi (Research and Graduate Training, Makerere University)
The research team consisted of the following researchers: Dr. Juliet Kiguli (Principal Investigator), Dr. Roy William Mayega, Dr. Francis Xavier Kasujja, Mr. Ramadhan Kirunda, Ms. Gloria Naggayi, Ms. Joyce Nabaliisa, Ms. Rita Kituyi, Sr. Nabwire Mary, and Sr. Nampewo Evarine Wabwire. The social norms study was made possible with funding by Mak-RIF (led by Prof. Bazeyo William) and Government of Uganda.
You may like
-
Makerere Launches Scholarly Guide, Calls for Increased Research, Publication and Innovation in Africa
-
BOKU University Charts New Collaboration Strategies with Mak’s Department of Zoology, Entomology & Fisheries Sciences
-
When Birth Becomes the Most Dangerous Moment, Wanduru & the Work of Making Labour Safer
-
VC Opens Training for MoKCC Officials on Safeguards in Procurement
-
Study Alert: Power in Her Hands; Why Self-Injectable Contraception May Be a Game Changer for Women’s Agency in Uganda
-
Building Skills for Better Public Investments: PIM Centre Trains Public Sector Economists
Health
Call for Applications: Short Course in Molecular Diagnostics March 2026
Published
3 days agoon
February 12, 2026By
Mak Editor
Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Department of Immunology and Molecular Biology, in collaboration with the Makerere University Biomedical Research Centre (MakBRC), is pleased to invite applications for a Short Course in Molecular Diagnostics scheduled for 23rd–27th March 2026.
This hands-on course will introduce participants to core principles and practical skills in molecular diagnostics, including nucleic acid structure and function, laboratory design and workflow, PCR setup, gel electrophoresis and DNA band interpretation, contamination control and quality assurance, and clinical applications of PCR in disease diagnosis.
The training will take place at the Genomics, Molecular, and Immunology Laboratories and will accommodate 30 trainees. The course fee is UGX 500,000.
Target participants include:
- Graduate students with basic exposure to molecular biology (e.g., MICM, MSBT)
- Final year undergraduate students (e.g., BBLT, BMLS)
- Medical and veterinary clinicians
- Agricultural professionals interested in practical molecular biology
To apply, please send your signed application via email to nalwaddageraldine@gmail.com (copy Dr. Eric Kataginy at kataginyeric@gmail.com). Indicate your current qualification, physical address, and phone contact (WhatsApp preferred), and attach a copy of your National ID or passport data page, your current transcript or testimonial, and your degree certificate (if applicable).
The application deadline is 13th March 2026. Successful applicants will be notified by email. Admitted participants are required to pay the course fee within five days to confirm their slot.
For further inquiries, don’t hesitate to get in touch with Ms. Geraldine Nalwadda on +256 701 361449.
See download below for detailed call.
Health
When Birth Becomes the Most Dangerous Moment, Wanduru & the Work of Making Labour Safer
Published
4 days agoon
February 11, 2026
The ward is never quiet during labour. Even at night, there are cries, some sharp with pain, others muted by exhaustion. Monitors beep. Midwives move quickly between beds. In the moments just before birth, everything narrows to breath, pressure, and time.
It was in places like this, years ago, that Phillip Wanduru first learned how fragile that moment can be.
Working as a clinical nurse at Nakaseke Hospital in central Uganda, he watched babies who should have survived struggle for breath. Some were born still. Others cried briefly, then went silent. Many were not premature or unusually small; they were full-term babies whose lives unraveled during labour.
“What troubled me most,” Wanduru recalls, “was that these were complications we have known how to manage for more than a hundred years, prolonged labour, obstructed labour, and hypertension. And yet babies were still dying or surviving with brain injuries.”
Those early encounters never left him. They became the questions that followed him into public health, into research, and eventually into a doctoral thesis that would confront one of Uganda’s most persistent and preventable tragedies.

A Public Defense, Years in the Making
On Friday, June 13, 2025, Wanduru stood before colleagues, mentors, and examiners in a hybrid doctoral defense held at the David Widerström Building in Solna, Sweden, and online from Kampala. The room was formal, but the subject matter was anything but abstract.
His PhD thesis, “Intrapartum-Related Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Burden, Consequences, and Models of Care from Studies in Eastern Uganda,” was the culmination of years spent listening to mothers, following newborns long after delivery, and documenting what happens when birth goes wrong.
He completed the PhD through a collaborative programme between Makerere University and Karolinska Institutet, under the supervision of Prof. Claudia Hanson, Assoc. Prof. Peter Waiswa, Assoc. Prof. Helle Mölsted Alvesson, and Assoc. Prof. Angelina Kakooza-Mwesige, a team that bridged global expertise and local reality. His doctoral training unfolded as the two institutions marked 25 years of collaboration, a partnership that has shaped generations of public health researchers and strengthened research capacity across Uganda and beyond.
By the time he defended, the findings were already unsettlingly clear.

One in Ten Births
In hospitals in Eastern Uganda, Wanduru’s research found that more than one in ten babies experiences an intrapartum-related adverse outcome. This medical term refers to babies who are born still, die shortly after birth, or survive with brain injury caused by oxygen deprivation during labour.
Among those outcomes, stillbirths accounted for four in ten cases. Five in ten babies survived with brain injury.
“These are not rare events,” Wanduru explains. “They are happening every day, often in facilities where care should be available.”
But survival was only part of the story.
Following infants diagnosed with intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy for a year, his research revealed that about seven in ten babies with severe brain injury died before their first birthday. Among survivors, many faced lifelong challenges, difficulty walking, talking, and learning.
“What happens in labour,” he says, “does not end in the delivery room. It follows families for years.”
He describes the findings of his PhD research as appalling, evidence of an urgent failure in how labour and delivery are managed, and a call for immediate action to prevent avoidable complications. “Babies with severe brain injuries,” he notes, “faced the greatest odds. Even when they survived birth, nearly seven in ten died before their first birthday. Of those who lived beyond infancy, about half were left with long-term challenges, including difficulties with walking, talking, or learning.”

Mothers at the Centre—Yet Often Invisible
Wanduru’s work did not stop at numbers. Through in-depth interviews with mothers and health workers, he uncovered a quieter truth that parents, especially mothers, were desperate to help their babies survive, but often felt unsupported themselves.
Mothers followed instructions closely. They learned to feed fragile babies, keep them warm, and monitor breathing. They complied with every rule, driven by fear and hope in equal measure.
“The survival of the baby became the only focus,” Wanduru says. “But the mothers were exhausted, emotionally drained, and often ignored once the baby became the patient.”
Even as mothers remained central to care, their own physical and mental well-being received little attention. For the poorest families, the burden was heavier still: long hospital stays, transport costs, and uncertainty about the future.
These insights shaped one of the thesis’s most powerful conclusions: saving newborn lives requires caring for families, not just treating conditions.
Why Care Fails—Even When Knowledge Exists
One of the most uncomfortable findings in Wanduru’s research was that emergency referrals and caesarean sections did not consistently reduce the risk of brain injury, except in cases of prolonged or obstructed labour.
The problem, he found, was not the intervention, but the delay.
In many facilities, hours passed between identifying a complication and acting on it. Ambulances were unavailable. Referral systems were weak. Operating theatres lacked supplies or staff.
“These are not failures of science,” Wanduru says. “They are failures of systems.”
His work reinforces a sobering reality for policymakers that most intrapartum-related deaths and disabilities are preventable, but only if care is timely, coordinated, and adequately resourced.
From Bedside to Systems Thinking
Wanduru’s path into public health began at the bedside. After earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from Mbarara University of Science and Technology in 2011, he trained as a clinician, caring for patients during some of their most vulnerable moments. He later completed a Master of Public Health at Makerere University in 2015, a transition that gradually widened his focus from individual patients to the health systems responsible for their care.
His work gradually drew him deeper into the systems shaping maternal and newborn care. As a field coordinator for the MANeSCALE project, he worked within public and private not-for-profit hospitals, helping to improve clinical outcomes for mothers and babies. Under the Preterm Birth Initiative, he served as an analyst, contributing to efforts to reduce preterm births and improve survival among vulnerable infants through quality-improvement and discovery research across Uganda, Kenya, and Rwanda.
In the Busoga region, he coordinated prospective preterm birth phenotyping, following mothers and babies over time to better understand the causes and consequences of early birth. Since 2016, this work has been anchored at Makerere University School of Public Health, where he serves as a Research Associate in the Department of Health Policy, Planning, and Management.
Across these roles, he found himself returning to the same question: why babies continue to die during a moment medicine has long learned to handle.
Models of Care That Could Change Outcomes
Wanduru’s thesis does more than document failure; it points toward solutions.
He highlights family-centred care models, including Kangaroo Mother Care, which keep babies and parents together and improve recovery, bonding, and brain development. He emphasizes early detection of labour complications, functional referral systems, and rapid access to emergency obstetric care.
“These are not new ideas,” he says. “The challenge is doing them consistently.”
He also calls for recognizing stillbirths, not as inevitable losses, but as preventable events deserving data, policy attention, and bereavement support.
“Stillbirths are often invisible,” he notes. “But they matter to mothers, to families, and to the health system.”
Research That Changes Practice
For Wanduru, the most meaningful part of the PhD journey is that the evidence is already being used. Findings from his work have informed hospital practices, advocacy reports, and quality-improvement discussions.
“Yes, the PhD was demanding,” he admits. “But knowing that the work is already contributing to change makes it worthwhile.”
His mentors see him as part of a broader lineage, researchers committed not only to generating evidence but to ensuring it improves care.
With a PhD in his bag, Wanduru sees his work as a continuation rather than a conclusion.

“The fight to make birth safe for every mother and baby continues,” he says. “I want to contribute to improving care and to building the capacity of others to do the same.”
That means mentoring young researchers, strengthening hospital systems, and keeping the focus on families whose lives are shaped in the delivery room.
Dr. Wanduru joins fellows in the MakSPH PhD forum who concluded their doctoral journeys in 2025, and his work speaks for babies who never cried, for mothers who waited too long for help, and for health workers doing their best within strained systems. It insists that birth, while always risky, does not have to be deadly.
— Makerere University School of Public Health Communications Office, Graduation Profiles Series, 76th Graduation Ceremony
Health
Study Alert: Power in Her Hands; Why Self-Injectable Contraception May Be a Game Changer for Women’s Agency in Uganda
Published
5 days agoon
February 10, 2026By
Mak Editor
By Joseph Odoi
In the remote villages of Eastern and Northern Uganda, a small medical device is doing far more than preventing unintended pregnancies, it appears to be quietly shifting the balance of power in women’s lives.
A new study titled “Is choosing self-injectable contraception associated with enhanced contraceptive agency? Findings from a 12-month cohort study in Uganda” has revealed that self-injection gives women more than just a health service, it can boost their confidence, control, and agency over their reproductive health.
The research was conducted by Makerere University namely; Professor Peter Waiswa, Catherine Birabwa, Ronald Wasswa, Dinah Amongin and Sharon Alum in collaboration with colleagues from the University of California, San Francisco
Why this Study matters for Uganda
For decades, family planning in Uganda has followed a provider-client model. Women travel long distances to clinics, wait in queues, and rely on health workers to administer contraception. This system creates barriers transport costs, clinic stock-outs, long waiting times, and limited privacy.
Self-injectable contraception, known as DMPA-SC, disrupts this model by shifting care from the clinic to the individual woman.
DMPA-SC is a discreet, easy-to-use injectable that women can administer themselves after receiving basic training and counselling.
What the Data Tells Us
To see if self-care technology actually shifts the needle on women’s power, researchers tracked 1,828 women across Eastern (Iganga and Mayuge Districts) and Northern Uganda (Kole, Lira, and Oyam Districts) for a full year. They compared women who chose to self-inject their birth control (216 women) against a control group, most of whom chose methods requiring dependency on clinics (1,612 women).
The Six-Month “Agency Spike”
The study used a Contraceptive Agency scale (scored from 0 to 3) to measure a woman’s internal confidence and her ability to act on her health choices.
The Self-Injectors
For the Self Injectors, their agency scores rose significantly, from 2.65 to 2.74 by the six-month mark.
The Clinic-Dependent Group
Scores for the group using mostly provider-led methods (like clinic shots or implants) remained nearly flat, moving from 2.61 to only 2.63.
Within just six months, women who took control of their own injections noted that they felt a measurable boost in their Consciousness of reproductive Rights (0.08 points) since they transitioned from being passive recipients of care to active decision-makers.
Using the Agency in Contraceptive Decisions Scale (scored 0–3), the study found a clear empowerment advantage for women who chose self-injection.
The findings come at a time when Uganda has reaffirmed its commitments under FP2030, aiming to expand access to voluntary, rights-based family planning. The study also aligns with the National Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan, which prioritises method choice, equity, and continuation, as well as national gender and youth empowerment strategies.
Can Uganda Sustain and Scale DMPA-SC?
Self-injectable contraception does not require continuous high-cost investment. Training and rollout costs are largely one-time, and the main recurring expense is the contraceptive commodity itself. Compared with the cumulative costs of repeated clinic visits for both the health system and women self-injection is more cost-effective over time.
Advancing primary health care with DMPA-SC
Beyond cost savings, self-injection eases pressure on health facilities and allows health workers to focus on more complex care. It also extends health services into communities, supporting continuity of care in areas where facilities are few and far between. In this way, family planning is no longer confined to the clinic.
While donor support has helped introduce the method, it can be sustained locally without relying on external funding. “With predictable national financing and reliable commodity supply chains, DMPA-SC can reach more women and be fully integrated into Uganda’s health system, strengthening both access and community-level service delivery’’ according to the researchers.
Implications for Policy and Practice
As Uganda continues to reform its primary health care system, the findings add evidence to ongoing discussions about how family planning services are delivered, financed, and prioritised.
The research also positions self-injectable contraception not as a temporary innovation, but as a scalable method with the potential to be embedded within national systems provided that commodity availability and financing are safeguarded.
To ensure these gains are lasting, researchers recommend moving beyond the technology and addressing the structural and social barriers that can limit women’s agency.
Key recommendations from the researchers include the following
1. Reliable Supply Chains
Empowerment collapses when products are unavailable. DMPA-SC must be consistently stocked at the community level.
2. Creating a Supportive Social Environment
Privacy concerns, stigma, and partner resistance must be tackled through community engagement and sensitisation.
3. Prioritizing Informed Choice
Self-injection should be offered as a top-tier option in every facility, framed as a fundamental right to autonomy rather than just a medical convenience.
4. Integrated Counseling
Providers must be trained to support women not only in the “how to inject” but also in navigating the social challenges of self-care.
On the next step, the researchers call for a clear integration of DMPA-SC into national health financing, protection of family planning commodity budgets, and deliberate scaling of self-injectable contraception within Primary Health Care reforms. These actions will ensure sustainability, reliable access, and greater control for women over their reproductive choices according to the researchers.
Read the full study here: https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(26)00003-X/fulltext
Trending
-
General2 weeks agoCall for Applications: Admission to Postgraduate Programmes 2026/2027
-
Natural Sciences2 weeks agoSimon Mungudit: Mak’s Best Performing Male Science Student & Rising Star in Petroleum Geoscience
-
Agriculture & Environment1 week agoFrom Adversity to Excellence: The Inspiring Journey of Makerere’s Best Science Student, Esther Ziribaggwa
-
Health2 weeks agoCall For Applications: MakNCD Masters and PhD Training Opportunities
-
Health2 weeks agoEU Earmarks Shs19.8bn for 15 Joint PhD Scholarships in Health, Environment Research