Health
Dr. Samalie Namukose and the Quiet Work of Making Nutrition Count
Between Tuesday, February 24 and Friday, February 27, 2026, Freedom Square at Makerere University will fill with a familiar choreography of anticipation. The air will fill with the rustle of academic gowns, the nervous laughter of graduands, and the careful positioning of proud families searching for familiar faces in a sea of crimson, green, and black. It is a moment of ceremony, yes, but also of reckoning.
Up close, the doctoral gowns feel heavier than they look. The deep crimson fabric, warm and deliberate, settles on the shoulders. Green panels edged in gold are gently pressed against the chest. Wide sleeves gently brush against clasped hands, soft bonnets rest low on foreheads, and tassels remain motionless. Beneath the regalia are steady breaths, quickened heartbeats, and bodies carrying the quiet fatigue of years spent balancing work, study, and life. These are garments worn not only for display but also for endurance, stitched to nights without sleep, to questions carried long before they were answered.
At this four-day Makerere University’s 76th Graduation Ceremony, 185 doctoral degrees will be conferred. Each PhD will represent years of unanswered questions, interrupted sleep, financial strain, and relentless intellectual persistence. Among them will be Dr. Samalie Namukose, a woman whose academic journey was never separate from the health system she serves, only threaded through it.
For more than two decades, Samalie Namukose has worked inside Uganda’s Ministry of Health, rising steadily from Nutritionist to Assistant Commissioner for Health Services/Nutrition. She has helped write policy, coordinate national programs, supervise districts, respond to emergencies, and advocate for mothers and infants whose voices rarely travel beyond clinic walls. Her PhD did not pull her away from that world but plunged her deeper into it.
The Question That Would Not Let Go
Dr. Namukose’s doctoral journey began not in a library, but in a pattern she kept seeing and could no longer ignore.
Uganda’s nutrition policies are robust. They speak clearly about the importance of maternal and infant nutrition, especially in the first 1,000 days of life. Yet in health facilities across the country, nutrition services often appeared fragmented, present in principle, and inconsistent in practice. Mothers attending antenatal or postnatal care were weighed, yes, but not always counselled. Infants were measured, but follow-up was irregular. Nutrition existed, but it was not always integrated.
“I kept asking myself,” she recalls, “not whether nutrition interventions exist, but how well they are embedded in routine care, and what prevents health workers from delivering them consistently.”
That question shaped her PhD research at Makerere University’s School of Public Health, where she examined the integration of Nutrition Assessment, Counselling, and Support (NACS) into routine health services in the Tororo and Butaleja districts in Eastern Uganda.
At its core, NACS integration is deceptively simple: assess nutritional status at every health point, provide tailored counseling, and link clients to support within the same system and beyond. But in practice, it tests the very backbone of health systems: workforce capacity, financing, governance, supervision, and community linkages.
“When NACS is well integrated, health facilities can identify nutrition risks early, prevent deterioration, and provide timely support rather than responding only when malnutrition becomes severe,” she says.
Inside Resource-Constrained Health Facilities
What Dr. Namukose found was not a clear story of failure or success, but something in between. Many health facilities were offering basic nutrition education and assessments, and health workers were clearly trying their best. However, long patient queues, limited time, and a shortage of basic tools and job aids often hindered counseling and follow-up. Food demonstrations were rare. Growth monitoring was inconsistent. Efforts to improve quality occurred only sporadically.
In facilities without trained nutritionists, nurses, and midwives, already stretched thin, took on nutrition work alongside many other duties, leaving little room to support mothers and children in a steady, continuous way.
And yet, her findings revealed something deeply hopeful: “facilities with knowledgeable, motivated, and supported health workers delivered better nutrition services, even within the same constraints.” To Dr. Namukose, this showed that leadership, mentorship, and attitude mattered. Where nutrition was treated not as an extra task but as essential care, outcomes began to improve.
One of the strongest findings from Dr. Namukose’s research was that even when nutrition services were only partly integrated, they still made a visible difference. Mothers gained weight more steadily during pregnancy and in the early months of breastfeeding. Babies were born heavier and grew better in their first months of life. Across health facilities with more fully integrated nutrition services, children consistently showed healthier growth patterns.
These were not just numbers on a page; babies started life stronger, and mothers were better supported to care for them.
“To me,” she explains, “the improvements in maternal weight gain reflected the value of regular assessment and context-specific counseling. For infants, the better growth outcomes showed that a package of nutrition interventions, delivered consistently, can make a real difference during the most critical window of life.”
It was clear evidence that nutrition integration works effectively, though gradually and significantly.
The Fragility of Progress
Dr. Namukose’s research also exposed how fragile these gains remain. Weaknesses in financing and governance emerged as the greatest threats to sustainability. Nutrition services often depended on unpredictable partner funding rather than routine government budgets. Essential supplies, anthropometric tools, job aids, and therapeutic foods were frequently unavailable or externally dependent.
Her study captured glaring governance gaps that compounded the problem. For instance, nutrition was not always clearly positioned within accountability structures, and this, according to Dr. Namukose, often led to limited supervision and weak performance monitoring. Many districts lacked dedicated nutritionists altogether.
She notes that community follow-up was essential for sustaining behaviour change after clinic visits, especially for those who suffered most. Village Health Teams and care groups struggled without supervision, feedback mechanisms, or resources.
“Most nutrition-related behaviours, such as maternal diet, infant and young child feeding, and care practices, are shaped and sustained within households and communities,” says Dr. Namukose.
She contends that nutrition integration cannot rely on projects but must be embedded in systems.
A PhD Written in the Margins of Life
Conducting this research while holding a senior national leadership role in the Ministry of Health was, by her own admission, one of the hardest things she has ever done.
Dr. Namukose did not request study leave. Partly self-sponsored, she worked full days at the Ministry of Health, then wrote at night, often between midnight and 4:00 am, and again in the early mornings, on Saturdays, and on borrowed hours of Sunday.
“There were days when I sacrificed sleep completely,” she says quietly.
National emergencies such as COVID-19, Ebola, and MPOX repeatedly interrupted her doctoral journey, drawing her back into crisis response. To her, returning to her PhD after each interruption felt like re-entering a conversation mid-sentence, struggling to find the thread.
At one point, she simultaneously prepared for a Top Management Committee presentation, attended a doctoral committee meeting, and sat for Health Service Commission promotional interviews.
“The pressure from the supervisors kept me on my toes. The PhD forum was another motivating factor, consistently sharing updates, books, courses, encouragement, and invitations to PhD defenses. Peer support was tremendous. Without a supportive family, you can’t make it,” she remarks.
A Career That Prepared the Ground
Dr. Namukose’s PhD sits atop a formidable professional foundation. She holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Agriculture from Makerere University, a Postgraduate Diploma in Food and Nutrition Security from Wageningen University in the Netherlands, and a Postgraduate Diploma in Business Administration from Makerere University Business School. She has undergone extensive training in nutrition leadership, research methods, health systems, and quality improvement across Africa, Europe, and Asia.
Within the Ministry of Health, she has served as a Public Health Nutritionist, Senior Nutritionist, Principal Nutritionist, and now Assistant Commissioner, coordinating national nutrition interventions, designing training modules, mobilising resources, and overseeing district implementation.
She has played key roles in multi-million-dollar initiatives, from HIV-Free Survival programmes to Integrated Child Health Days, public food procurement policy, and the scale-up of Multiple Micronutrient Supplements (MMS) for pregnant women.
Her research has been published in leading peer-reviewed journals, including PLOS ONE and BMC Health, Population and Nutrition, ensuring that her findings speak both to policy and global evidence.
On a mission to keep research from gathering dust
Now a Doctor of Philosophy, Dr. Namukose has determined that her work will not sit quietly on a shelf. Her findings have already informed Uganda’s Health Sector Nutrition Strategic Plan, strengthening the case for financing, governance reform, and recruitment of skilled nutrition cadres. She continues to champion platforms, such as national nutrition symposia, that bring student research into policy dialogue and implementation spaces.
“Very often, excellent student research is left on the shelves. I plan to allocate some days during these symposia to nutrition students to showcase best practices and innovations,” she says.
Adding that, “I urge mothers and their infants to actively engage in self-care, growth-promotion, and monitoring activities to improve their own health and that of their children.”
Central to her recommendations is a call to embed nutrition services within routine health and community systems, with sustained government leadership, financing, and competent human resources.
Integration, she insists, is not achieved by guidelines alone, but through continuous engagement with frontline health workers and communities.
As graduation day approaches, Dr. Namukose’s thoughts turn outward. To frontline health workers delivering nutrition services under pressure, her message is one of respect and reassurance. Even with limited resources, the assessments they conduct, the counselling they provide, and the care they offer can change outcomes.
“Endeavor to participate in training programmes whenever available to bridge gaps in nutrition knowledge and skills, including on-the-job and rotational training to support cost-effective and efficient nutrition service delivery,” she asks.
To mothers and caregivers, she urges active engagement in self-care, growth monitoring, and nutrition programmes, especially those strengthened through digital innovation.
And to policymakers, her research offers both evidence and urgency that nutrition integration is no longer optional but foundational to maternal and child health.
When Dr. Samalie Namukose walks across the stage at Freedom Square, followed by applause, the true weight of that moment lies in health facilities where nutrition is no longer an afterthought. In mothers whose pregnancies are better supported. In infants whose growth curves bend upward, quietly, decisively.
Among the 185 PhDs conferred at Makerere University’s 76th graduation, the School of Public Health Communications Office shares her story, which is a reminder that the most transformative scholarship is not always loud. It builds patiently, between policy meetings and midnight writing, between emergencies and examiners’ comments, until it transforms systems and lives from within.
Makerere University’s School of Public Health (MakSPH) showcased research, training and international partnerships supported through European Union funding during the EU Uganda Research and Study Fair 2026 held at Makerere University.
The fair brought together students, researchers, academics, government representatives and development partners to explore opportunities in education, research, innovation and international collaboration, while celebrating 50 years of partnership between Uganda and the European Union.
Through its exhibition, MakSPH highlighted research and capacity building initiatives addressing public health challenges including infectious diseases, non communicable diseases, health systems, climate change and pandemic preparedness.
18 EU funded projects supported at MakSPH
Prof. Rhoda Wanyenze, Dean of Students, School of Public Health, said the School has benefited from 18 EU funded projects over the past five years, supporting research and training across several areas of public health.
She said the projects have contributed to the training of PhD researchers and the development of research addressing infectious diseases and prevention, non communicable diseases, health systems, climate change and health.
Prof. Wanyenze also highlighted a new five year programme which started in 2021 that is aiming at strengthening capacity for research on pandemic preparedness and response, including outbreaks such as Ebola.
Another programme being undertaken with the Ministry of Health and Karolinska Institute focuses on improving maternal health while also addressing adolescent pregnancy and the health of mothers and children.
She described partnerships as critical to advancing science and innovation, noting that collaboration allows researchers in Africa and Europe to share knowledge and strengthen the impact of research on communities.
Research partnerships strengthen innovation
Prof. Robert Wamala, Director of the Directorate of Research, Innovation and Partnerships at Makerere University, said the exhibition provided an opportunity to showcase EU funded projects across the University.
He noted that the School of Public Health alone has more than 18 such projects, while other colleges also have several EU supported initiatives.
One of the projects showcased was PREPARE TID, a partnership aimed at developing rapid diagnostic technologies for emerging and re emerging infectious diseases.
Prof. Julius Okuni, Associate Professor of Veterinary Pathobiology and Molecular Diagnostics at Makerere University, said the project brings together universities, industries and other organisations from Africa and Europe.
The project is working to develop technologies that can quickly identify pathogens responsible for outbreaks such as Ebola, Rift Valley fever and Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever.
According to Prof. Okuni, Makerere is involved in field and laboratory work to test and refine the technologies before they can be delivered to end users.
Fair provides platform for research visibility
For researchers at MakSPH, the fair also provided an opportunity to increase the visibility of ongoing research and create new connections with researchers, policymakers and potential funders.
Dr. Raymond Tweheyo, Honorary Lecturer and Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, said such exhibitions allow researchers to share their work and identify others working on related challenges.
He cited the CONNECT for Health project, which focuses on transforming non-communicable disease care in Uganda through collaboration with partners across several countries.
Dr. Tweheyo said exhibitions can help researchers connect with policymakers, civil society organisations and other partners who can contribute to translating research into practical solutions.
Assoc. Prof. Angelina Kakooza Mwesigye, Associate Professor and Child Neurologist at Makerere University College of Health Sciences, also emphasised the importance of exposing young people to international research opportunities.
She said the long standing Uganda Europe partnership provides opportunities for the next generation of researchers to learn, build networks and prepare for future research collaborations.
The School of Public Health’s participation highlighted the role of international partnerships in strengthening research capacity, supporting innovation and developing evidence based responses to Uganda’s public health challenges.
Uganda has strengthened its ability to respond rapidly to Ebola and Marburg outbreaks once cases are confirmed, but delays in frontline detection, health worker exposure, emergency financing bottlenecks and incomplete implementation of lessons from previous outbreaks continue to undermine preparedness, a study has found.
The findings were presented today, October 6, 2026, during a country validation workshop convened by the Meeting Targets and Maintaining Epidemic Control (EPiC) project, to examine lessons from Uganda’s response to filovirus disease outbreaks. The study was undertaken by Makerere University School of Public Health and FHI 360.
Presented by Dr. Steven Kabwama, the synthesis examined Uganda’s experience with recurrent Ebola virus disease (EVD) and Marburg virus disease (MVD) outbreaks between 2000 and 2026, drawing particularly on After-Action Reviews from the 2017 Marburg outbreak and the 2019, 2022 and 2025 Ebola outbreaks. The work seeks to consolidate recurring strengths, weaknesses, innovations and lessons that had previously been documented separately.
Uganda has recorded 12 filovirus outbreaks over the 26-year period, including nine Ebola and three Marburg outbreaks, according to the research team. Among the four outbreaks examined closely were the 2017 Marburg outbreak in Kween and Kapchorwa, the cross-border Ebola outbreak in Kasese in 2019, the multi-district Sudan Ebola virus outbreak in 2022, and the 2025 outbreak whose index case was a health worker.
Strong systems after confirmation
Across the outbreaks reviewed, the synthesis found that Uganda has developed significant capacity to mobilise after laboratory confirmation. National and district task forces and technical response structures are activated quickly, supported by strong laboratory capacity, established coordination mechanisms and increasingly sophisticated surveillance systems.
The country has also built laboratory capacity around the Uganda Virus Research Institute, mobile laboratories, genomic sequencing, sample referral systems and the Results Dispatch System. Digital surveillance tools, Village Health Teams, survivor champions and established national and district coordination structures have further strengthened response capacity.
Detection remains a weak point
However, the findings point to a critical problem before confirmation: recognising a possible outbreak early enough.
For outbreaks originating within Uganda, the synthesis found that the period between a patient’s first presentation and confirmation ranged from nine to 27 days. This the study found is linked to low clinical suspicion and weaknesses in screening. Other recurring challenges included delayed access to emergency financing, infections among health workers, disruptions to essential health services, community mistrust and stigma, and limited follow-through on recommendations from previous After-Action Reviews.
Opening the workshop, the Dean, Prof. Rhoda Wanyenze, said understanding these delays requires going beyond identifying broad weaknesses to examining where response systems fail in practice.
“We can identify a broad challenge such as delayed detection from the literature, but your experience on the ground can help us understand the specific factors that create that challenge,” Prof. Wanyenze said while addressing district health officials from across the country.
“When we begin looking for solutions, we need to be able to target the actual problems rather than simply identifying broad challenges.”
The workshop brought together partners and colleagues from districts, including people directly involved in outbreak response, to validate the synthesis against frontline experience. Prof. Wanyenze noted that published literature, scientific papers and response reports cannot capture every operational reality, making practitioner experience essential to understanding where delays occur and what interventions have worked. Remarks validation workshop
Turning outbreak experience into continuous readiness
Among the priority actions proposed are stronger screening and alert systems for earlier detection; ring-fenced emergency financing and more reliable responder payment systems; routine infection prevention and control training; stronger occupational protection for health workers; continued investment in laboratories and genomic sequencing; and preparedness extending beyond districts traditionally considered outbreak hotspots. The study also recommends stronger community engagement and a formal mechanism to track and finance implementation of recommendations from After-Action Reviews.
Dr. Andrew Acero, Director of the EPiC project at FHI 360’s Uganda Office said the central challenge is ensuring that experience accumulated during successive outbreaks translates into lasting institutional capacity.
“The real value lies in ensuring that what we learn changes what we do. Our findings should inform policy, shape guidelines and training, strengthen systems and ultimately improve practice.”
He noted that preparedness cannot begin only after an emergency has been declared, but must be built through sustained relationships, systems and capacity before outbreaks occur. Remarks validation workshop
The EPiC project is led by FHI 360 with core partners including Right to Care, Palladium and Population Services International.
Uganda’s latest national HIV survey reveals lower viral suppression among adolescents and young adults living with HIV than among older adults, even as the country records substantial improvements in controlling the virus. The findings come from Uganda Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (UPHIA 2025), a national household survey examining HIV prevalence and whether people living with the virus know their status, receive treatment, and achieve viral suppression.
Releasing the preliminary UPHIA 2025 findings at the Uganda Media Centre on 1 October 2026, Minister of Health Hon. Dr. Chris Baryomunsi called for earlier prevention and testing, particularly among adolescent girls and young women, alongside support for treatment adherence. “We must reach out to the young people, ensure that they have information, they test, take treatment, and adhere to the treatment guidance,” he urged.
Hon. Baryomunsi recalled how fear had discouraged testing during his university years: “I remember when we were at university, we went for testing at the university hospital. We sat there for three hours. Some of us left without even testing because it was scary.” Today, he explained, “even if you test HIV positive, you can be initiated on treatment, and you live normally like the rest of those who don’t have HIV.”
UPHIA 2025 was locally led under the Ministry of Health’s overall leadership, with Makerere University School of Public Health serving as the prime implementer, a role ICAP at Columbia University held in the previous two surveys. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics led sampling, while the Uganda Virus Research Institute and National Health Laboratory and Diagnostic Services led laboratory operations. Regional referral hospitals and local governments supported implementation, and the U.S. government provided US$10 million through PEPFAR, along with technical assistance from the U.S. CDC.
UPHIA collected data from July to September 2025 among people aged 15 and above, including those outside routine treatment services. Of 6,283 eligible households, 94.4% completed interviews. Researchers interviewed 13,801 people and tested 13,477 for HIV.
Testing followed Uganda’s national algorithm, with laboratory confirmation of positive samples, viral-load measurement, and checks for antiretroviral medicines to establish treatment use. Researchers weighted the estimates to account for the sampling design. Participants received counselling and results, and those who tested positive were referred for treatment.
Hon. Baryomunsi thanked participants and their families for welcoming survey staff and contributing their time, information and samples, without which the national evidence would not have been available.
National progress and the youth gap
The survey estimated HIV prevalence, which means the proportion of people living with HIV, at 5.9% among those aged 15 and above, corresponding to about 1.496 million people in this age group nationwide. Prevalence was 7.3% among women and 4.1% among men, ranging from 1.3% in Karamoja to 8% in the South Western region.
Among people aged 15 and above living with HIV, 86% had achieved viral suppression, meaning a low amount of HIV in the blood, measured in UPHIA as fewer than 1,000 copies per millilitre. Suppression stood at 69.3% among adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 living with HIV, compared with 89.9% among those aged 50 and above. These estimates cover people living with HIV regardless of whether they know their status or receive treatment.
HIV prevalence among people aged 15–24 was 1.5%, including 2% among young women and 1% among young men. Among young women, prevalence was 1.3% at ages 15–19 and 2.8% at ages 20–24. These differences support attention to earlier prevention and testing, although they do not establish when infections occurred.
The highest prevalence estimates occurred among middle-aged adults: 15.7% among women aged 40–44 and 11.7% among men aged 45–49. Lower suppression among young people therefore requires attention alongside the higher HIV prevalence among middle-aged adults. Comparing the same age group across both surveys, viral suppression among people aged 15–64 increased from 74.9% in 2020–21 to 86.1% in 2025, while HIV prevalence remained at 5.9%.
Diagnosis and the path to 2030
The treatment results identify diagnosis as the main national gap. Among people aged 15 and above living with HIV, 85.3% knew their status. Of those aware, 99.1% were receiving treatment; among those receiving treatment, 96.5% had achieved suppression.
The 95-95-95 targets aimed for 95% of people living with HIV to know their status, 95% of those diagnosed to receive treatment, and 95% of those receiving treatment to achieve viral suppression by 2025. Among people aged 15 and above, Uganda exceeded the treatment and suppression targets, while diagnosis remained below target. UNAIDS’s Global AIDS Strategy 2026–2031 retains these targets towards ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.
According to WHO, viral suppression protects health and helps prevent HIV transmission. Uncontrolled HIV weakens the immune system, increasing the risk of serious illness. With continued treatment as prescribed, sexual transmission risk is negligible when HIV remains suppressed but detectable, and zero when undetectable. The Uganda AIDS Commission estimated over 34,000 new HIV infections in 2025, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis, timely treatment, and sustained suppression alongside other prevention measures.
The demographic stakes are substantial. People aged 15–24 constituted 21.2% of Uganda’s population in the 2024 census. The country’s Fourth National Development Plan, covering 2025–2030, prioritises a healthy, knowledgeable, skilled and productive population and reducing HIV through primary health care. Protecting young people’s health, therefore, supports their participation in education, work, and national development; UPHIA helps identify where services need greater attention.
Turning evidence into action
The study’s conclusions identify three priorities: sustain treatment outcomes, find people unaware of their status, and improve suppression among younger people. Permanent Secretary Dr. Diana Atwine connected the findings to the Ministry’s planning.
“We do believe that these results are a true reflection of what is happening in our country as far as the HIV status is concerned, and we do believe that it will give us a very clear direction and the roadmap that we are going to take in the next five years to target and to get our targets achieved.”
Acting on these priorities requires funding for services and research. Hon. Baryomunsi outlined plans to target resources where needs are greatest, strengthen district services and align partner support with government priorities. Responding to journalists’ questions, he noted the government’s intention to increase domestic funding for the HIV response, including research.
“The HIV/AIDS response, including research and surveys such as this one, has largely been funded by partners in the past. The government of Uganda is committed to allocating more resources from our domestic budget to support the response and research,” he noted.
For the first time in the UPHIA series, the survey assessed selected noncommunicable disease indicators among people aged 15 and above: 15.5% had elevated blood pressure, 24.8% were overweight or obese, and 0.9% had raised random blood glucose. These screening findings align with the Ministry’s integration agenda and Hon. Baryomunsi’s call to bring HIV and chronic care services together to address people’s wider health needs.
Speaking at the release of the preliminary results, U.S. Embassy Chargé d’Affaires Mikael (Mika) Cleverley described UPHIA 2025 as the first Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment worldwide fully led and implemented by the country itself.
“The study was led by Ugandan scientists, Ugandan managers, Ugandan public servants, Ugandan field teams, from design to data collection to analysis. And this is what two decades of focused strategic U.S. foreign investments in the public health sector was meant to produce, is to reinforce Ugandan leadership and Ugandan-led efforts.”
At the survey launch on 29 May 2025, MakSPH Dean Prof. Rhoda Wanyenze highlighted the partnership’s contribution: “The partnership between Makerere University and CDC has not only helped build national capacity in surveillance and epidemiology, but has also strengthened our ability to lead high-quality, large-scale national surveys.”
The Dean added: “After two decades of joint work, we are proud that UPHIA is now a fully Ugandan-led effort. This is critical to the sustainability of the skills and knowledge generation to inform our local response.”
UPHIA 2025 shows how far Uganda’s HIV response has advanced and where gaps remain. As the country works towards ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, reaching young people with testing, treatment, and continued care will be essential to extending those gains.
Read the full UPHIA 2025 summary results here:
-
General1 week agoStatement on Concerns Circulating Regarding a Member of Academic Staff
-
General1 week agoPress Statement: Incident Involving Death of a Student at Makerere University
-
General2 weeks agoMakerere Marathon 2026 – Running to Equip the Disability Support Center
-
General1 week agoBeyond Map Size: Africa’s Agency Should Not Be Funded by Other People
-
General1 week agoJNLC Leadership Symposium Equips Young Leaders for Responsible and Transformative Leadership