Eutychus Ngotho Gichuru is a Doctoral Student at East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development, College of Education and External Studies (CEES), Makerere University.
The announcement of the freezing of foreign aid by U.S. President Donald Trump sent shock waves around the globe, and one of the main sectors that would feel the consequences in Uganda was higher education. American aid had been a godsend for Ugandan universities as many have enjoyed support in their research, scholarship, and infrastructural projects. This withdrawal of such vital financial support has exacerbated existing challenges, making the need for innovative solutions to keep the higher education sector afloat quite urgent.
The Immediate Impact
The freeze in American foreign aid has brought about an immediate financial shock to the Ugandan higher education sector, considering its historical dependence on U.S. funding. The most conspicuous effect is in research funding, where universities have for a long time depended on grants from the USAID and other educational institutions for projects in health, agriculture, and technology. These funds now being frozen means that critical research programs, like HIV/AIDS research at Makerere University, have been brought to a screeching halt. This retardation of scientific progress not only reduces Uganda’s contribution to global research but also impoverishes achievements in public health and technology. Further, scholarships provided by American institutions have been disrupted, which has thrown current beneficiaries into financial crisis and barred any prospective students from opportunities for higher education. The loss of these scholarships goes a long way in affecting student opportunities, especially among those who had avenues of social mobility. Another effect of the freeze has been felt on Ugandan universities regarding infrastructural development, which aims to ease pressures associated with learning environments. Because USAID had previously financed the construction of lecture halls, libraries, and laboratories, institutions without such support could only struggle to maintain quality education facilities, further leading to classroom congestion and resource shortages.
Long-term Educational Consequences
The freezing of this aid has repercussions that go beyond the immediate financial blow to encompass long-term ramifications threatening to unravel stability at higher education in Uganda. Long-term effects include compromises on quality education, whereby with reduced funding, there is the tendency for universities to cut budgets in faculty development; this may be disastrous in securing qualified educators. This may lead to larger class sizes, outdated teaching materials, and a general decline in academic standards. The freeze also threatens international collaborations between Ugandan and American institutions, which have been instrumental in fostering academic exchanges and joint research projects. Loss of these partnerships isolates Uganda from global academic networks, limiting opportunities for knowledge transfer and innovation. Other key concerns are the brain drain, as reduced prospects for research funding and academic growth may drive across the border some of the best scholars and students. This would weaken the nation’s workforce through the exodus of intellectual capital, negatively affecting national development. If not strategically intervened upon, the country will continue experiencing a prolonged educational crisis that may take years to get out of, increasing the gap between Uganda and other more developed academic systems around the world.
Case Studies: The Human Element
In drives to flesh out the human face behind the aid freeze, specific case studies were crucial in regard to Uganda’s higher education sector. Makerere University, recognized for its research excellence and the country’s premier institution, has suffered immensely due to funding disruptions. Projects focusing on HIV/AIDS research, which were largely supported by American grants, are now at risk of stagnation. This indeed, affects not only the university’s standing globally but also the greater fight against HIV/AIDS within Uganda, which has had tremendous progress in combating the epidemic. Similarly, Kyambogo University has emerged with programs in special education and vocational training; however, it faces acute setbacks. In this regard, various programs aimed at supporting students with different abilities can no longer easily secure alternative funding, thus marginalizing such groups as far as the educationist support is concerned. These examples epitomize that freezing of aid is not an abstract financial problem; it’s real people-students, educators, and researchers-dependent on American aid to advance interests for their career and academic objectives. The money dried up-cuts across the lives, damped aspirations, and threatens wiping out years of gains in this East African country.
What Can Be Done?
Regardless of whether the crisis has been less or more severe, there are a few approaches that could help the higher education sector in Uganda reduce the shock of the freezing of aid: first, diversification of funding. First and foremost, the Ugandan government should prioritize education in its budget to ensure that universities receive appropriate financial support. This might be supplemented by the introduction of educational bonds, specific education taxes, and the increase in national research grants. Additionally, deeper interaction with the private sector can promote scholarships, endowments, and research grants that orient education to market demands. Secondly, international partnerships with non-American institutions in Europe, Asia, and Africa could also provide sources of funding and collaboration opportunities. Further, the institutional resilience would be enhanced by cost management and income generation. The universities should also maximize all their financial resources by embracing full digital transformation-which would lower dependence on real estate infrastructure-while looking out for other opportunities like online course sales and offering consultancy services. Thirdly and lastly, there is also advocacy and influencing policy. For this, it is important that educational bodies urge the U.S. government toward exemptions or reviews of the foreign aid policy. Domestically, there is a need for policies that emphasize education funding and incentivize private sector investment in academia. Alumni networks can also be leveraged to make contributions toward university endowments, which could be used to grant scholarships and finance research projects. Finally, there is a need to adapt to new realities through curriculum reform and technological integration. Ugandan universities should, therefore, design curricula with an emphasis on practical skills that reduce foreign aid dependence by making them self-sustaining. Integrating technology in education, such as offering online courses to international students, can also generate revenue and expand Uganda’s academic influence globally.
Conclusion
The Trump aid freeze serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of educational systems that overly depend on foreign assistance. For Uganda, it is a call to action-an opportunity to restructure and fortify its higher education framework to become more self-sufficient and resilient. While the immediate implications of the freeze are indeed daunting, this crisis offers an opportunity for innovation, new partnerships, and construction of sustainable funding mechanisms. Diversification of funding sources, reinforcement of institutional resilience, policy advocacy, alumni engagement, community outreach, and new educational models-these are how Uganda’s higher education sector may surmount the setback and grow stronger. The future of Ugandan higher education lies in strategic adaptation, not dependence. The proactive steps will be more appropriate. This crisis can accelerate the wheels of long-term improvement in the performance of Uganda universities with stakeholders’ timely intervention so that even with falling global finance, Uganda universities may continue to prosper.
Eutychus Ngotho Gichuru is a Doctoral Student at East African School of Higher Education Studies and Development, College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University.
When one walks through the College of Education and External Studies at Makerere University, one definitely feels the positive energy and a growing desire to write a research grant.
The new motivation for scholars at the College of Education and External Studies to focus on writing and winning grants, stems from the good news that has been spreading like a wild fire – that a team of dedicated College staff, partnering with key entities, have won a grant worth one million EUROS (about UGX4 billion).
The grant is to support the implementation of a research titled, Transitioning Higher Education Regulators and Universities to Competence Based Education in East and West Africa.
Makerere University is the Lead partner in the implementation of the grant, courtesy of the following members of staff from the College of Education and External Studies who dared the long days and nights to write the proposal: Associate Prof. Josephine Esaete (Principal Investigator), Dr. Alfred Buluma (Co-Principal Investigator), Dr. Michael Walimbwa, Dr. Julius Shopi Mbulankende, and Ms Teddy Nassali.
The grant brings on board a consortium of nine (9) partners from Uganda, Ghana, Spain and Portugal. These include: Makerere University (Lead Partner), Mountains of the Moon University, University of Ghana, University of Education-Weniba, University of Barcelona, Pedagogical Institute of Portugal, National Council for Higher Education-Uganda, Ghana Tertiary Education Commission, and the Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM).
On receipt of the good news, the College Principal, Prof. Anthony Muwagga Mugagga, congratulated his staff upon the remarkable milestone, which positions Makerere University and the College of Education and External Studies at the centre of transforming the education sector in Africa. Prof. Mugagga noted that winning such a grant was timely, as Uganda continues to take steps to implement competence-based learning at the primary, secondary and university levels of education.
Makerere University’s College of Education and External Studies (CEES), through its Department of Science, Technology, and Vocational Education (DSTVE), on Friday 18th July 2025, hosted a high-level workshop for secondary school administrators focused on the implementation and assessment of the Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) in science subjects.
The day-long workshop, held under the theme “The Role of School Administrators in Implementing and Assessing the Competence-Based Curriculum for ‘O’ and ‘A’ Levels of Secondary Schools,” drew participants from across Uganda’s secondary school education sector — head teachers, directors of studies, and other senior school leaders charged with ensuring that Uganda’s schools align with the country’s evolving education goals.
The workshop, held at Makerere University Yusuf Lule Central Teaching Facility Auditorium, was not just a dialogue but a clarion call to administrators to take ownership of their critical role in transforming science education through effective leadership, monitoring, and support for their teachers.
Addressing the Gap Between Policy and Practice
In her remarks, Dr. Marjorie S. K. Batiibwe, Head of DSTVE at Makerere University, welcomed participants and underscored the unique responsibility of administrators in ensuring the success of the competence-based reforms. “Teachers may have the necessary qualifications — some even hold master’s degrees — but without your support as administrators, the implementation of CBC risks remaining theoretical,” she said.
Dr. Marjorie S.K. Batiibwe, Head of DSTVE.
Dr. Batiibwe highlighted the Department’s long-standing contribution to teacher training in sciences — Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Mathematics, Agriculture, Food and Nutrition — and stressed the department’s commitment to building the capacity of educators at all levels. “We train both undergraduate and postgraduate teachers. We recognize that without a supportive school environment led by informed administrators, even the best-trained teachers will struggle to implement CBC effectively.”
She also pointed out persistent challenges, including low female participation in science subjects, reaffirming the department’s commitment to programs that encourage girls’ engagement in STEM through mentorship, science expos/exhibitions, and career guidance initiatives.
The Critical Role of Mindset Change
Delivering the keynote address, Prof. Anthony Muwagga Mugagga, Principal of CEES, spoke candidly about Uganda’s education history and the entrenched attitudes that continue to undermine progress. Drawing from his personal journey —which demonstrated that he struggled as a science student throughout his academic journey leading to a professor of philosophy — Prof. Mugagga stressed that Uganda’s greatest challenge is not lack of intelligence, but a failure to cultivate the right mindset among both educators and learners.
Prof. Anthony Muwagga Mugagga, Principal of CEES delivering a keynote speech.
“What fails our students is not intelligence, but mindset. Every student is capable; it’s the teacher and the school leader who either unlocks or blocks that potential,” Prof. Mugagga remarked. He challenged school leaders to champion a shift in attitudes, especially among teachers who may still be clinging to outdated, exam-focused methods.
He illustrated this with a moving anecdote about his own daughter, who failed Senior 4 on her first attempt, but succeeded spectacularly after being allowed to choose subjects she was passionate about. “Mindset change — in both the student and the teachers — was what made the difference,” he said.
Science Education Must Translate into Practical Competence
Associate Professor Mathias Mulumba Bwanika, Dean of the School of Education, framed his remarks around the practical implications of science education for Uganda’s transformation agenda. He highlighted that Uganda’s heavy investment in STEM disciplines comes with expectations. “Science teachers are not just preparing students for exams, but for life,” he said.
The Dean, School of Education, Associate Prof. Mathias Mulumba Bwanika.
Using the example of China’s pragmatic approach to education, Associate Prof. Mulumba lamented Uganda’s culture of theoretical science instruction. “If your physics or biology student cannot fix simple problems at home, we are failing. Science must be practical,” he emphasized.
He called on administrators to establish structures within their schools for continuous professional development, arguing that successful CBC implementation requires ongoing learning, collaboration, and leadership from school management. “The curriculum is only as good as its implementation. Administrators must lead from the front,” he urged.
Teachers Struggling Between Old Habits and New Demands
Mr. Mudde Moses Ronald, a national trainer under SESEMAT at the Ministry of Education and Sports, painted a realistic picture of the challenges teachers face transitioning from knowledge-based to competence-based approaches. “Many teachers are caught between what they were taught and what is now expected. They are not resistant out of defiance, but because they are confused or not supported,” he said.
Mr. Mudde Moses Ronald from Ministry of Education and Sports.
Mr. Mudde emphasized the importance of problem-based learning in CBC, where learners are encouraged to identify real-life challenges and devise solutions. He gave an example of learners tackling environmental degradation through problem identification, questioning, and solution generation — a model he said fosters critical thinking and application of science to everyday problems.
He acknowledged persistent gaps: “Some teachers still struggle with asking the right questions, with lesson planning, or even with technology. Administrators must create environments that support rather than punish these efforts.”
He called for continuous training, peer mentorship, and supportive leadership to help teachers adapt and thrive under CBC.
NCDC: The Curriculum is Sound, But Schools Must Act
Mr. Wilson Ssabavuma from the National Curriculum Development Centre (NCDC) offered a comprehensive overview of Uganda’s CBC reforms and reiterated the government’s commitment to providing resources and training. He traced Uganda’s curriculum reform journey, rooted in the need to move away from colonial models towards education that fosters problem-solving, creativity, and socio-economic transformation.
Mr. Wilson Ssabavuma from NCDC presenting to School Administrators and Teachers.
“Education must help learners transform themselves and their communities. Otherwise, we are wasting time,” Mr. Ssabavuma said. He explained that Uganda’s CBC emphasizes practical activities, continuous assessment, and learner-centered methods over rote memorization.
He acknowledged implementation challenges — from resource gaps to teacher resistance — but warned against passiveness. “Schools and teachers must stop waiting passively. Take initiative. Engage with professional learning communities, peer coaching, and in-house training. The curriculum is there; success depends on how well you implement it,” he advised.
The Way Forward: Administrators as Change Leaders
Throughout the day’s discussions, a consistent message emerged: school administrators are not passive observers, but active leaders in the CBC journey. Their role is to ensure that teachers are equipped, supported, and monitored effectively. This includes embracing policies such as the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) requirement of two hours per week, fostering internal collaboration, and aligning school objectives with national education goals.
Administrators were reminded that effective leadership in CBC implementation requires more than enforcement — it demands understanding, empathy, and strategic support for teachers grappling with the transition. The workshop emphasized that the success of Uganda’s competence-based reforms hinges on school leaders modeling the very competencies they seek to instill: critical thinking, adaptability, collaboration, and innovation.
Conclusion: A Collective Responsibility for Uganda’s Future
As the workshop drew to a close, participants left with a renewed sense of purpose. They were challenged to return to their schools not just as managers, but as champions of a transformative vision for science education — one where every learner is equipped to solve real-world problems, contribute meaningfully to society, and drive Uganda’s socio-economic development.
Dr. Batiibwe captured the spirit of the day in her closing remarks: “Let us stay connected, let us share experiences, and let us continue working together for the good of our learners, our schools, and our country.”
The success of CBC, it was made clear, will depend not just on policies or curricula, but on the daily decisions, attitudes, and actions of school leaders across Uganda.
The Office of Academic Registrar, Makerere University has released the admission list of Diploma holders provisionally admitted to Bachelor of Education (EXTERNAL) programme under Private Sponsorship for the Academic Year 2025/2026 pending verification of their academic documents by the awarding institutions.
The List can be accessed by following the link below: