Business & Management
Mak implored to research into the Centralization of Forest Governance in Uganda
Mpigi District Local Government and stakeholders in the forestry sector want Environmental economists from Makerere University to conduct research into the impacts of centralizing the governance of national forests in Uganda.
According to section 54 (1) a of the National Forestry Act, 2003, management of all Central Forest Reserves is the mandate of National Forestry Authority (NFA) whereas that of Local Forest Reserves is the direct responsibility of the district forest officer as specified under section 48 (3) e of National Forestry Act, 2003. All forestry activities are guided by the National Forestry Policy 2001.
Poor forest governance has been blamed for the depletion of the ecosystem in Uganda. The people of Mpigi contend that since government mandated NFA to manage national forests, most of the forests have been depleted and they want national forests governance decentralized.
To achieve this districts officials and stakeholders say, Makerere University should conduct research into the impact of centralizing national forest governance to provide evidence for policy change. This call was made during the policy dialogue held at the district chambers organized by the Environment for Development Initiative (EfD-Mak) Centre on 22nd November 2022. The university team was led by the Director represented by Dr. John Sseruyange.
The meeting brought together representatives of the district political and technical arms, civil society organizations, the private sector, elders and opinion leaders, farmers leaders under the theme, “Forestry and Biodiversity: Addressing Challenges of Forest degradation and Enhancing Environmental Management in Uganda”.
The participants discussed the key governance issues in the forestry sector, how communities can be strengthened to participate in forest recovery programs and what best forest restoration mechanisms should be adopted to revert the forest destruction trends in Uganda.
Governance here referred to, “the norms, institutions, and processes that determine how power and responsibilities over forests are exercised, how decisions are taken and how citizens – including women, men, youth, indigenous people and local communities – secure access to, participate in, and are impacted by the management of forests”
Presenting the status of forests in Mpigi district, the Chief Administrative Officer represented by the District Natural Resources Officer Mwidyeki Anthony said the management of forests in Mpigi has been so challenging and has on a number of occasions raised many issues involving NFA, the district and the community living adjacent to the forests.
“It should be noted that, the once thick forests in Mpigi district which had a collection of Muvule, Setaala, Musizi and other indigenous tree species have and are still gradually being reduced to empty land or replaced with eucalyptus trees for many reasons.
The natural forests reported that indigenous species that had survived for ages are now being abruptly ruined. This tragedy has befallen all the natural forests in Mpigi, a district once blessed with a wide range of biodiversity. Most natural forests in Muduuma and Kiringente have completely gone”, Mwidyeki submitted.
Mwidyeki explained that all the central forest reserves in Mpigi district with exception of Mpanga forest have been faced with the problem of encroachment in form of cultivation, grazing and settlement while in most of all the reserves, conflicts resulting from unclear boundaries are very common and have sometimes resulted in court cases leading to loss of time and money.
The vegetation cover of most Central Reserve Forests in Mpigi according to Mwidyeki have been changed into eucalyptus plantations, boundary markers uprooted, increasing forest encroachment, land grabbing and conflicts between NFA staff and communities living adjacent to these forests.
Besides population pressure that has increased the demand for fire wood, charcoal and land for settlement, Mwidyeki alleged that there has been creation of illegal land tittles in these reserves, construction of roads and industrialization.
Mwidyeki however highlighted a number of initiatives undertaken to promote forestry. These included; Sensitization and training of communities in forestry management, distribution of tree seedlings across the district, establishment of the district nursery bed, training and supervision of nursery owners on acquisition of quality tree seed and conducting routine inspections to detect and deter illegal forestry activities.
Representing the Director, EfD Mak Centre, Research Fellow Dr. John Sseruyange underscored the importance of forests as major stores of atmospheric carbon contributing to the regulation of climate change, water quantity, mitigating the effects of high flows in wet periods and low flows in the dry periods.
He said forests contribute to soil and water protection and biodiversity conservation and supply well over 90% of Uganda’s energy requirements in the form of fuel wood.
“Sustainably managed forests give environmental benefits, sustainable economic development and improve the quality of life of people across the country”, Dr. Sseruyange said
Sseruyange reported that the Uganda forestry sector reforms (1998 – 2003) aimed at providing more efficient and effective forest administration, management and utilization of Uganda’s forest resources, through: The Forestry Policy (2001), The National Forestry Plan (2002),
The NFTPA (2003) and a new institutional framework for the management of forestry resources in the country.
These resulted in the birth of institutions such as: The NFA, the UWA, the DFS, private forest owners and community forests owners which distributed responsibilities between the central government, local government agencies, the private sector, NGOs, community based organizations and the local communities.
The reforms according to Sseruyange aimed at promoting multi-stakeholder participation, transparency, integrity and professionalism in management of the forestry sector.
“Despite these good intentions, the forest estate in Uganda has continued to shrink from 4.9 million hectares in 1990 to currently 2.3 million hectares, NFA (2015) a loss of over half of the forests in a span of 25 years. …. However, over this period, 46% of protected woodlands- mostly those under NFA, were lost.
The reasons for this decline are mostly attributed to poor forest governance, and particularly problems with forest law enforcement and governance, and associated institutional issues” , He stated.
The main causes of deforestation according to Dr. Sseruyange relate to issues of governance in the forestry sector, illegal and unregulated trade of forest products and the unsecured forest tenure rights. Other issues are the conversion of forest land to other land use types such as agriculture and urbanization, and rampant felling of trees for firewood and charcoal burning.
In her closing remarks the Deputy Resident District Commissioner Maria Lubega described the dialogue as timely, thanked the university for choosing Mpigi, pledging the district commitment to support efforts geared towards restoring the environment.
Lubega wants an evidence based report on forest governance from Makerere University for presentation to the relevant government organs.
“Two weeks ago, the President sent someone from his office to come because he was interested in the environment restoration, and we are working on this report. When the report about this dialogue is ready share with us because it is timely, and I shall share with it directly with the president because NFA is just an authority and the other one is a fountain of honor so we shall take our views to the president”. She said.
Participants speak out
During the panel and plenary discussions participants expressed the need to decentralize the management of all forest reserves to the district.
“The forest sector is the least funded. Officers vehicles get stuck with no fuel. The moral fabric of the people of Mpigi is filled with, I don’t care attitude. NFA has been nicknamed as “nfa” meaning I am dying. NFA efforts are not coordinated with the district office. The District Natural resources officer should have been a member of NFA, there is a lot of political interference while implementing policies with orders from above”, The District Senior Entomologist Onyango Oluoch decried.
The District Forestry Officer Ssengendo Micheal says the major issue is governance.
“When you look back, the forests were intact and management was proper. All regulations were being followed. With the new changes in the policy of 2001 when they brought in NFA, that is where we all lost it because there was confusion and no coordination because of the bad governance.
The first thing we need to do is to revert back the old system. We need to have staff at every level. We need the forest guards, forest rangers but all these were reduced by two per district which is really over whelming when it gets to implementation of our forest management”.
Nsamba Benon, a Political leader says, districts had powers to safeguard forests but more damage has been done when powers were shifted from local government to central government.
“Ever since NEMA took over, there is a very big damage on our forests as compared to long ago. It is our mandate to protect the environment. The business of centralizing powers has done more harm than good to our country.
It is possible to bring all stakeholders to board to protect the environment but it cannot be possible if people are seeing non-residents cutting away indigenous trees planting and owning eucalyptus trees. The biggest issue here is policy. It should be reversed and our Forest Officer takes charge”.
Opinion leader, Frank Kawooya says the laws are weak and segregatively applied to a few.
“These laws are weak. Those who are supposed to manage forests cut the forests and replace them with eucalyptus. Now we see that forests have begun being shared. Am touched, in the past forestry students at Makerere would not be awarded degrees without coming to study in Lwamata forest . Today no child ever comes to study because forests are no more.”
The District Environmental Police Commandant says those mandated to guard the forest are the ones that cut the trees. He is opposed to the idea of replacing natural forests by eucalyptus and says enforcement is also problem.
“In 1924 we had an inventory for counting trees in Masaka. We counted trees about 2000. There is a forest called Buzilango but, of recent when went there, I found that there are people living there. It was no longer a forest for government. Forest guards are the ones who cut trees and sell to bakeries and schools. Eucalyptus is not good because they drain water at a high speed and, were introduced by industrialists who wanted to build industries.
But we of enforcement have a problem. You go and see a person with a car carrying timber and there is no legal document showing. When you stop the car, you will hear the person referring you to talk to another person. Sometimes there is collaboration with NFA and timber dealers connected from above. I suggest the powers should be brought back, decentralize forest reserves so that districts own, oversee and manage the forests. We need to sensitisize masses to look beyond financial gains but the future generation because in 50 years, we may not have any natural forest”.
A representative from the NGO forum called for sensitisation of the people on district and national forests.
“Different roles must be emphasized. Demarcations for individual, district and national forests must be emphasized. After sensitization they will know the species to plant”.
The District Farmers’ Chairperson Stella Nantamba says farmers are in weather crisis.
“Farmers rely on land. Soil is infertile, weather patterns have changed and many have resorted to forests and wetlands. Information given to farmers is distorted and weather changes are adverse Intervention requires adoption of agroforestry for environmental conservation and food security”.
But for teacher Emmanuel, charity begins at home and community. Sensitization form the community level will help children internalize the importance of forests.
“There is need for mindset change of those mandated to protect the environment so that children learn from them. Privatization of forests should be discouraged to save forests”, he said.
KAMPALA, Uganda | July 16, 2025. The Director of the Environment for Development Initiative–Makerere University Centre (EfD-Mak), Prof. Edward Bbaale, outlined key achievements, challenges, and future plans during the 2nd Advisory Board Meeting held at Makerere University with members calling for expanded scope and sustainable funding for the center’s activities.
The Advisory Board comprises 13 members drawn from Makerere University, government ministries and agencies, civil society, and the private sector. The Board’s role is to provide oversight and strategic guidance to EfD-Mak.
The EfD-Mak Centre is part of the global Environment for Development (EfD) network, comprising 15 research centers worldwide. It aims to promote evidence-based environmental policy through interdisciplinary research, academic training, and stakeholder engagement.
Addressing the board, Prof. Bbaale highlighted the center’s progress since its inception in 2019, including impactful policy engagement, capacity-building programs, and pioneering research in environmental economics.
“Our journey started in Vietnam when Makerere University was formally admitted into the EfD network. Since then, we’ve worked toward a mission of promoting inclusive growth and environmental sustainability,” said Prof. Bbaale.
Chaired by Prof. Buyinza Mukadasi, Makerere’s Academic Registrar and Acting Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic Affairs), the meeting also welcomed the new Deputy Director of EfD-Mak, Dr. Alice Turinawe, who replaces Prof. Johnny Mugisha.
Prof. Bbaale reported significant growth in research output, including over 150 publications and collaborations with national and international bodies such as the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), the National Planning Authority, and the Ministry of Finance. The center is currently implementing projects on forestry, climate finance, and sustainable agriculture with partners across Uganda and the wider EfD global network.
The center’s interdisciplinary approach, drawing researchers from the Colleges of Business and Agricultural Sciences, was praised for its alignment with Makerere’s research strategy.
Notably, the center has launched a new Master’s in Economic Investment Modeling, designed to integrate climate variables and natural capital into macroeconomic frameworks. “This is a timely addition as the world looks for tools to understand the economic impact of climate change,” said Bbaale.
The center has intensified policy engagements through dialogues and training programs for government officials, focusing on environmental valuation, energy transitions, and macroeconomic modeling. The Inclusive Green Economy (IGE) program, funded by SIDA, has trained senior policymakers across East Africa on sustainable finance and green transition strategies.
EfD-Mak also played a role in shaping Uganda’s National Development Plan IV, with several fellows contributing to mainstreaming environmental concerns such as clean cooking and e-mobility.
“We were proud to be recognized as a runner-up globally for policy influence on clean cooking,” Bbaale noted, adding that Makerere’s visibility within the EfD network and international platforms continues to grow.
Despite the progress, Prof. Bbaale cautioned against over-reliance on a single funder, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), stating that diversified funding is essential for sustainability.
“While SIDA remains our main supporter, we recognize that this model is not sustainable in the long term,” he said, urging the board to support efforts to secure institutional status for the center within the university’s research policy framework.
For 2025, EfD-Mak will focus on climate-smart agriculture as a thematic policy dialogue and strengthen its footprint in local government engagement. A grant targeting environmental valuation at the local level and a new project on macroeconomic modeling for climate resilience are expected to launch.
Prof. Bbaale also cited a clean audit and positive external evaluation as indicators of the center’s strong governance and operational efficiency.
Quoting Pope Francis, he closed with a warning on the urgency of environmental action: “God always forgives. Men sometimes forgive. But nature never forgives.”
Board Chairperson Calls for Stronger Alignment with SDGs and Inclusivity in Research Programs
Prof. Buyinza Mukadasi, Chairperson of the Advisory Board called for deeper integration of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), inclusivity, and results-based reporting in the Centre’s research and academic programs.
Prof. Buyinza congratulated the EfD-Mak team led by Director Prof. Edward Bbaale on their notable achievements across academic training, research, and policy engagement.
“We want to congratulate you and your entire team for all the academic and impact achievements you have made,” Prof. Buyinza said. “You can clearly see the success at the academic training level, at the research level, and policy engagement. These are strong pillars of your program.”
However, the Chairperson emphasized the need to explicitly link the Centre’s work to Uganda’s national development agenda and global frameworks.
“What we want to see more of in future presentations is a clear connection to the Sustainable Development Goals,” he said. “Any investment going into research or human capital development must be traceable to the SDGs and the National Development Plan. This is essential, especially when responding to expectations from institutions like the National Planning Authority.”
Prof. Buyinza also urged the Centre to enhance inclusivity in its fellowship and research programs by targeting underrepresented groups, including students and researchers with special needs.
“You are doing well with your agenda and research priorities, but now it is time to move further toward inclusivity,” he said. “Let’s also see data on gender representation and the involvement of individuals with special needs. That would reflect equitable capacity development.”
He applauded the Centre’s results-based management approach and its focus on tangible outcomes. “I’m happy you did not dwell on challenges,” he added. “It shows maturity and strategic focus.”
Prof. Buyinza concluded by inviting reflections from other board members on areas where the Centre could improve, encouraging a collaborative approach to continuous development.
Board Members Call for Stronger Private Sector Links, Local Engagement, and Global Positioning for EfD-Mak Centre
Members of the Advisory Board for the Environment for Development Initiative praised the Centre’s achievements in research and policy influence but called for greater integration with the private sector, deeper engagement with local development initiatives, and enhanced visibility on the global stage.
Several board members shared constructive feedback following a presentation by the Centre’s Director, Prof. Edward Bbaale, outlining the Centre’s milestones and strategic direction.
Julius Byaruhanga representing the Private Sector Foundation Uganda (PSFU), applauded the Centre for bridging the gap between academia and policymaking but urged for a similar approach with the private sector.
“Much of the research generated in academia doesn’t speak to private sector investment,” Byaruhanga said. “We need partnerships that show how climate and energy research can guide private sector financing, especially around energy efficiency.”
He proposed collaboration between EfD-Mak and PSFU in energy efficiency and policy advocacy, noting PSFU’s experience with several donor-funded projects and its role as the apex body influencing government policy on behalf of the business community.
Onesmus Mugyenyi, from acivil society organisation, emphasized the need for coordination among actors working on similar thematic issues, especially in policy advocacy.
“When we don’t coordinate, we duplicate efforts and end up with incomplete or stuck projects,” Mugyenyi said. “Mapping stakeholders and integrating practitioners into training would greatly enhance both policy impact and student learning.”
He also stressed sustainability and advised leveraging the Board’s networks to support resource diversification and long-term institutionalisation of the Centre’s initiatives.
Dr. Sam Mugume, representing the Ministry of Finance, recognized the Centre’s contribution to national capacity building, particularly in climate finance and macroeconomic modeling.
“You’re doing important work,” Mugume said. “But we now need to scale up and integrate your training and modeling capacity into broader macroeconomic planning for climate resilience, both nationally and at the African continental level.”
He noted the Ministry’s current engagement with a coalition of African finance ministers on climate action, urging the Centre to establish itself as a key academic partner in that process.
Apollo Kagwa, from the National Planning Authority (NPA), commended the Centre for its academic rigor but highlighted the need for grassroots relevance.
“EfD-Mak still operates at a high level,” Kagwa observed. “We need to bring its research down to address real issues in communities—how does it inform programs like the Parish Development Model (PDM)?”
He proposed the Centre tap into government consultancy opportunities and leverage alumni networks to generate internal revenue. Kagwa also encouraged participation in global climate policy spaces, such as the upcoming COP meeting in Brazil, and to develop capacity in climate economics.
Chairperson Prof. Buyinza Mukadasi welcomed the feedback and praised board members for offering actionable insights.
“These are excellent observations,” Prof. Buyinza said. “The next phase must involve deepening our links with the private sector, coordinating better with government and civil society actors, and preparing to expand our impact from local to global levels.”
Jane Anyango is the Communication Officer EfD Uganda.
Business & Management
Makerere’s PIM Centre Concludes Training on Certificate of Financial Implications (CFI)
July 11, 2025 | Jinja, Uganda
The Public Investment Management (PIM) Centre of Excellence at Makerere University successfully concluded a two-week training on the Certificate of Financial Implications (CFI) – Integrated Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis, equipping 34 economists from various Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) with critical policy evaluation and fiscal analysis skills.
The closing ceremony, held at the Pearl on the Nile Hotel in Jinja on July 11, 2025, marked a significant milestone in Uganda’s public finance management reform agenda. Participants received certificates in recognition of their commitment and newly acquired competencies under the revised Guidelines for Financial Clearance, which took effect on July 1, 2025.
Commissioner Paul Mwanja, who represented the Permanent Secretary and Secretary to the Treasury, officiated the ceremony. In his remarks, he commended participants for their dedication despite the demanding timing, coinciding with the financial year-end and the launch of the Fourth National Development Plan (NDP IV). He emphasized that the training comes at a critical moment as Uganda enters a growth-focused fiscal year and prepares for the 2026 general elections.
“The Revised Guidelines for Financial Clearance mark a paradigm shift towards a more data-driven, transparent, and inclusive approach to policy and legislative evaluation,” Mwanja stated. “You are the first wave of reformers. Go back as champions, create demand for quality analysis, and drive the change we want to see.”
The CFI training was designed to deepen participants’ ability to assess the financial and economic implications of government proposals, identify potential winners and losers, and design safeguards for vulnerable groups. It also aims to strengthen MDAs’ capacity to prepare their own Statements of Financial Implications and align with Regulatory Impact Assessments.
Representing the PIM Centre, Prof. Ibrahim Mike Okumu, Dean of the School of Economics at Makerere University, lauded the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED) for its foresight in establishing the Centre in 2023. He described the training as a powerful response to Uganda’s triple policy challenge: scale, scarcity, and speed.
“This certificate program doesn’t just teach you to ask if a project is beneficial,” Prof. Okumu said. “It trains you to assess whether it is beneficial, affordable, and resilient in real-world fiscal contexts. That is how we build trust in public spending and deliver smarter infrastructure, services, and jobs.”
Prof. Okumu also charged graduates to apply their skills at project, portfolio, and policy levels—prioritizing value for money, institutionalizing evidence-based decision-making, and mentoring future cohorts. “Go forth and make every shilling count,” he concluded.
The Ministry announced that the next CFI training cohort will commence in August 2025, as part of a nationwide rollout to ensure all government institutions are staffed with analysts capable of implementing these reforms. The long-term goal is to establish a government-wide foundation of professionals committed to fiscal discipline, data integrity, and evidence-based policymaking.
The event closed with optimism and a renewed commitment to strengthening Uganda’s public finance systems through knowledge, rigor, and reform-minded leadership.
Business & Management
School of Business Conducts Strategic Leadership Training for Makerere University Managers
Makerere University School of Business under the College of Business and Management Sciences (CoBAMS) is conducting a five-day strategic leadership training for the first cohort of University managers.
The Executive training (7th to 11th July 2025) for middle and top level managers seeks to foster leadership capacity in line with the University’s strategic goals. The participants nominated from the different units within the University include: Deputy Principals, Deans, Heads of Departments, and Heads of sections in Administrative Units.
The Strategic Leadership course covers critical areas such as Strategic leadership overview and contemporary issues, Driving strategic leadership to promote organizational performance and success, Leading people in Organizations, Organizational culture and productivity, Strategic Communication, and Organizational change and development.
The course is delivered by seasoned facilitators from the School of Business, the private sector, industry and business community namely Associate Prof. James Wokadala, Associate Prof. Godfrey Akileng, Dr. Martin Bakundana, Dr. Sam Eyamu, Dr. S.B. Wanyama, Ms. Irene Nayera, Mr. Henry Rugamba, and Mr. Ronald Bbosa.
Addressing the participants, the Dean-School of Business, Associate Prof. Godfrey Akileng pointed out that learning was a continuous process, stating that the training was aimed at fostering professional leadership development and lifelong learning.
He elaborated that the training brings on board university leaders who are entrusted with managing people. Emphasizing that people are the most important resource in an organization/institution, the Dean highlighted the need to train and equip those managing offices, with strategic leadership knowledge, skills and values.
Unpacking the concepts of leadership and management, Associate Prof. Akileng revealed that most organizations need leaders, and not managers. In light of this, he stated that most business schools in the world were emphasizing leadership more than management. He explained the paradigm shift from traditional management practices to leadership-focused training, with a special call to leaders to always adapt and navigate complex organizational environments.
The Principal of the College of Business and Management Sciences, Prof. Edward Bbaale, represented by the Deputy Principal-Associate Prof. James Wokadala underscored the College’s pivotal role as a hub of excellence in Business, Economics, and Management. The Principal highlighted the growing significance of strategic leadership in today’s academic and professional landscapes, noting that even seasoned leaders must continue evolving in their leadership practices.
Sharing his lived experience, Associate Prof. James Wokadala, disclosed that a significant number of people entrusted with offices or managerial positions fear to make decisions. “One of key challenges faced by several organisations and universities is the fear by leaders and managers to take bold decisions. To address this challenge, this strategic leadership training conducted by the School of Business has been designed to empower you, with knowledge and skills in strategic decision making,” he stated.
The Coordinator of Partnerships and Collaboration, Dr. Martin Bakundana highlighted the importance of the program in developing leadership skills in a dynamic business environment. He acknowledged the growing relevance of leadership concepts such as transformational and thought leadership.
“We are at a turning point in the world of leadership, and it is essential for Makerere University to prepare its leaders for the challenges ahead,” Dr. Bakundana said. He encouraged participants to engage with the support team throughout the training, reinforcing the collaborative nature of leadership development. Dr. Bakundana is a Lecturer in the Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Business, at the College of Business and Management Sciences.
The remarks from the aforementioned University officials, set the pace for the training sessions. The first day featured two topics: Strategic Leadership Overview and contemporary issues by Associate Prof. Godfrey Akileng, and Driving Strategic Leadership to promote Organizational performance and success by Dr. Sam Eyamu.
Presenting the Strategic Leadership overview and contemporary issues, Associate Prof. Akileng tackled the following: The concept of change and the need to adapt, disruption being the new normal, strategic leadership styles, strategic leadership skills, as well as the principles of strategic leadership.
He kicked off his presentation by a powerful quote that enabled the audience to understand and appreciate the current business terrain. “We stand on the brink of technological revolution that will fundamentally alter the way we live, work, relate to one another. In its scale, scope and complexity, the transformation will be unlike anything humankind has experienced before,” Klaus Schwab Founder and Executive Chairman World Economic Forum.
Associate Prof. Akileng stated that change is a fact that is inevitable in our lives, with the landscape in which we work, constantly changing. He mentioned that organizations/institutions as well as Organizational settings do change, which necessitates leaders and staff to adapt to the trends by doing things differently. “I implore the leadership and staff to change the way they do things, if we are to survive,” he said.
Acknowledging that disruption is the new normal, he encouraged the participants to confront VUCA situations through strategic decision making. Coined in the early 2000’s, the military-derived an acronym-VUCA, which stands for Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and, Ambiquity.
Cognizant that change is inevitable, and that VUCA situations are prevailing in most organizations and business settings, Associate Prof. Akileng introduced the different strategic leadership styles namely transformative, visionary, transactional, and collaborative. He challenged the participants to apply the best leadership style or a blend of them.
For instance, Associate Prof. Akileng advised the middle and top level managers to utilize the collaborative leadership style when marketing a brilliant idea or an innovation. “You must work with others or behind the scenes to ensure that those in authority understand and support your idea.”
Drawing on lessons from past industrial revolutions, Associate Prof. Akileng emphasized that embracing technological advancements is critical for staying relevant. “History shows us that industries that failed to adapt to new technologies inevitably failed to compete,” he remarked.
Specific to education, he explained that COVID-19 disrupted teaching and learning. He added that most of the Universities in Africa that were pre-dominantly delivering lectures through physical interaction had to change and adapt to the terms and conditions dictated by the new normal. Universities embraced blended learning in order to overcome the disruption that threatened their comfort zones and preferred way of doing things.
He cited Makerere University, which deployed a blend of transformative, participant, and collaborative strategic leadership styles to rejuvenate its online learning systems/platforms. The Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic Affairs), the College of Education and External Studies through its Institute of Open, Distance and e-Learning (IODel) worked with Colleges and the Directorate of ICT Support services (DICTS) to bring on board academic staff.
The Dean, School of Business indicated that the new normal in university education involves integration of online teaching, digital pedagogies, artificial intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR) in teaching and learning, research and community engagements.
He called upon the participants to take into account the following strategic leadership skills: Foresight, curiosity, decisiveness, active listening, communication and diplomacy. He stressed that active listening is a key skill for a strategic leader.
Tackling the principles of Strategic leadership, the Dean-School of Business pointed out that strategic leaders are always on the top. He added that strategic leaders are innovative individuals, who are always pushing through brilliant ideas.
He notified the participants that strategic leaders take on the format of an eagle. “You must have a great vision with ability to navigate stormy turbulence, exhibit fearlessness, take the initiative, and have a high sense of self determination.”
Presenting to the participants, Dr. Sam Eyamu, from School of Entrepreneurship and Management at Kyambogo University, provided insights into strategic leadership with an emphasis on organizational performance. He defined leadership as the ability to create a lasting legacy through collaboration. “Effective leadership inspires and unites teams, ensuring that their collective efforts have a long-term impact,” he said.
Dr. Eyamu guided that strategic leaders must work with others, be able to influence, and must create change. He articulated that strategic leaders should embrace Artificial Intelligence (AI). He advised university leaders and staff to accept that AI is the new normal, and work together to come up with policies and approaches on the integration of AI in the university systems and processes.
He added that strategic leaders should be resilient with ability to survive and lead the team to the desired goal. He called upon the participants to set goals, use key performance indicators, come up with work plans, score cards, and among other methods that measure performance. He introduced several tools designed to align strategy with performance, including the Balanced Scorecard, Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). Dr. Eyamu disclosed that celebrating small successes can accumulate into significant organizational momentum.
Dr. Eyamu highlighted two distinct leadership approaches: Rapid Fire Leadership, which encourages trying multiple strategies quickly and the Sniper Leadership that focuses on a more deliberate and calculated approach.
He argued that both approaches are valid depending on the available resources, with resilience and persistence being key to success in either model. He also emphasized the importance of clear strategic direction, ensuring that all team members understand their roles in achieving organizational goals.
Additionally, Dr. Eyamu stressed the critical importance of performance measurement tools, such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), work plans, and the Balanced Scorecard, to track progress toward strategic goals. He introduced performance dashboards, which provide real-time data, and benchmarking, which allows organizations to compare their performance with industry best practices.
Dr. Eyamu introduced the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework, which balances social impact, environmental sustainability, and financial performance. He said that organizations must take a holistic approach to success, considering more than just the financial outcomes.
Presenting the practical tips for success, he encouraged the participants to; adopt a performance measurement framework and tool, foster and reward a culture of accountability and results, lead by example, be transparent by ensuring a consensual decision-making process, and empower team members through delegation of duties and trusting them to deliver.
The first day of the Strategic Leadership Training ignited the strategic leadership potential of the participants, which involves getting out of the comfort and safe zone, to champion the transformation at the institutional or Unit levels. The University leaders and participants in general, were encouraged to take charge by being alert, studying the times and trends, as well as coming up with innovations and strategies to create a positive difference.
The Strategic Leadership Training was moderated by Dr. Martin Bakundana-Coordinator of Partnerships and Collaboration assisted by Ms. Ritah Namisango-Principal Communication Officer.
-
General2 weeks agoRe-advert: Admission to Undergraduate Programmes 2025/2026
-
General1 week agoRe-Advert for Applications for Diploma and Certificate Training
-
General5 days agoMakerere University Fees Waiver for 40 First Year Female Students 2025/2026
-
General2 weeks agoPress Statement on Ranking
-
Health1 week agoCall for Applications: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Course