March 26, 2026 – Soroti, Uganda  

Environmental and natural resource officers from Eastern Uganda have undergone intensive training on economic valuation, evaluation, and accounting of natural resources, in a move aimed at strengthening evidence-based environmental management at district level.

The training, held at Jasmine Hotel in Soroti, brought together district environmental officers, forestry officers, agricultural officers, planners and natural resource managers from at ten districts, including Palisa, Butebo, Busia, Bukedea, Jinja, Mbale, Kapchorwa, Iganga, and Soroti.

Organised by Environment for Development (EfD) Uganda and funded by the Government of Uganda through the Makerere University Research and Innovations Fund (Mak-RIF), the capacity-building initiative seeks to equip local government officers with practical tools to better manage natural resources amid growing environmental pressures.

Speaking at the opening of the training, Dr. Peter Babyenda, representing the EfD Centre Director and Principal Investigator Prof. Edward Bbaale, emphasized the importance of continuous skills development among environmental practitioners.

He noted that while many officers already possess foundational knowledge, refresher training is essential in a rapidly evolving field. “Capacity building is critical. We must keep reminding ourselves and sharing experiences so that we remain relevant and effective in our roles,” he said.

The training focused on key areas including environmental valuation and evaluation, environmental accounting, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. According to Babyenda, the programme was informed by a prior survey that revealed significant skills gaps among district officers, particularly in valuing natural resources such as wetlands and forests.

Babyenda stressed that the ability to quantify the economic value of natural resources is crucial for informed decision-making. “If districts can assess and assign value to resources like swamps and forests, it strengthens national planning and ensures these resources are not undervalued or degraded,” he said.

He further highlighted the importance of cost-benefit analysis in guiding policy decisions. “When policymakers ask for alternatives to resource exploitation, officers must be equipped to present evidence-based scenarios that balance conservation and development,” he explained.

The training also introduced participants to emerging concepts such as circular economy practices, where waste is transformed into valuable resources. Dr. Babyenda cited examples of innovations in waste management, including the conversion of human waste into energy and organic fertilizer.

“Gone are the days when waste was simply discarded. Today, every form of waste has value from energy generation to carbon credit opportunities,” he noted, urging officers to embrace such innovations in their districts.

Participants were also being encouraged to leverage their new skills to attract funding for local environmental projects, including climate financing opportunities. Small grants, he noted, can support community-driven solutions to environmental challenges.

In addition, the programme underscored  the role of district officers in generating data for national development frameworks. Accurate environmental data, including biodiversity indicators, is increasingly critical for Uganda’s reporting on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and national planning instruments such as the National Development Plan IV (NDP IV).

“We cannot develop national indices like biodiversity indicators without your input. You are central to data collection and reporting,” Dr. Babyenda said.

He urged participants to act as change agents by sharing knowledge gained from the training with colleagues in their respective districts. “When you go back, ensure that this knowledge is cascaded. Let us leave here transformed and ready to make an impact,” he said.

The training in Soroti marks the final session in a series that has been conducted in various regions across the country, including Jinja, Masaka, Entebbe, and Arua. Babyenda  expressed hope that additional funding will be secured to extend similar capacity-building initiatives to more districts.

Facilitators at the training include Dr. Nick Kilimani, who led a sessions on environmental accounting, and Ms. Alice Nalweera, who covered climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.

As environmental challenges intensify due to population growth and increased demand for natural resources, experts say such trainings are essential in promoting sustainable resource use while supporting local economic development.

Environment at the Center of Uganda’s Development Agenda

Environmental economist Dr. Peter Babyenda has called for stronger efforts to value and protect Uganda’s natural resources, warning that failure to do so could undermine the country’s long-term development.

Presenting on Environmental valuation and evaluation  Dr. Babyenda emphasized that the environment—defined as both living and non-living surroundings remains the backbone of economic activity and human survival.

He noted that the environment provides essential resources such as water, minerals, forests, and oil, which support livelihoods and national growth. Uganda’s recent gains in gold exports and ongoing oil developments, he said, demonstrate the economic importance of natural resources.

“The environment sustains life, supplies resources, and even determines the quality of life,” he explained, adding that areas with clean water, forests, and scenic beauty often command higher land values.

Dr. Babyenda pointed out that many people prefer living in well-preserved environments, citing high property prices near water bodies like Lake Victoria as evidence of nature’s economic value.

Poverty and Environmental Degradation

However, he stressed that poverty remains a major driver of environmental destruction. Communities often resort to deforestation and unsustainable farming practices in search of survival. “You cannot stop someone from cutting a tree for charcoal when they have nothing to eat,” he said.

Participants highlighted key environmental challenges in eastern Uganda, including poor agricultural practices, deforestation, climate change, landslides in highland areas, and flooding in low-lying regions. Many of these, he noted, are largely human-induced.

Beyond economic benefits, Dr. Babyenda underscored the importance of ecosystem services, including cultural and spiritual values. He explained that many communities derive identity, medicine, and traditions from natural resources.

Natural systems also support agriculture through soil fertility and pollination. He warned that misuse of chemicals could threaten pollinators like bees, potentially affecting food production.

With Uganda’s rising population, demand for land, food, and energy is increasing, placing pressure on forests, wetlands, and wildlife. Expanding agriculture, urbanization, and illegal logging are among the key threats.

Dr. Babyenda also noted emerging global policies requiring environmental accountability, such as traceability in coffee production to ensure crops are not grown on deforested land.

Why Environmental Valuation Matters

A central theme of the presentation was environmental valuation, the process of assigning monetary value to natural resources.

Dr. Babyenda explained that valuation helps policymakers make informed decisions, especially when balancing conservation with development. For instance, a forest may generate more long-term economic benefits than short-term gains from clearing it for agriculture.

He introduced key valuation methods such as Willingness to Pay (How much individuals would pay to access or preserve environmental resources) and Willingness to Accept: (Compensation required for losing environmental benefits).

These approaches, he said, can help quantify both direct uses like timber and tourism and indirect or non-use values, such as preserving resources for future generations.

Dr. Babyenda urged environmental officers to document and report risks proactively, noting that failure to act early often leads to severe consequences when disasters occur.

He cited Uganda’s policy framework, including Vision 2040 and environmental laws, as critical tools for sustainable management. However, he stressed that implementation requires proper data, budgeting and justification.

“Once you know the value of something, you are more likely to protect it,” he said.

The presentation concluded with a call for collective responsibility in safeguarding Uganda’s biodiversity, which includes forests, wetlands, savannahs, and national parks.

Dr. Babyenda encouraged innovation in land use, better planning, and increased investment in environmental protection, warning that the country’s future depends on how well it manages its natural wealth.

“Development and environmental protection must go hand in hand,” he said.

Environmental Accounting Key to Sustainable Development

Environmental accounting is critical for Uganda’s sustainable development, with district-level officers playing a pivotal role in safeguarding natural resources, according to environmental expert Dr. Nicholas  Kilimani.

Presentation to technical officers, Dr. Kilimani emphasized that environmental management is no longer an auxiliary function but a central component of national development. “The environment in which we live affects the economy, human health and our livelihoods,” he said, warning that failure to account for natural resources could have far-reaching consequences

Dr. Kilimani highlighted the connection between ecological health and economic outcomes. “When forests are cleared or wetlands polluted, agricultural yields fall, water resources degrade, and diseases increase. This affects the economy in ways that conventional indicators like GDP often fail to capture,” he explained.

He cited examples such as unsustainable fish harvesting, pollution from industrial effluents, and deforestation, which can reduce Uganda’s revenue from exports and compromise public health. “If investors pollute water resources, fish stocks die, and we lose both income and markets,” he said, stressing the need for vigilant oversight by environmental officers.

Understanding Environmental Accounting

Central to Dr. Kilimani’s message was the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), a framework designed to integrate environmental data with economic indicators.

“This system allows us to track resources like water, forests, fish, and energy, showing both their contribution to the economy and how human activity affects them,” he said. By combining social, economic, and environmental data, policymakers and technical officers can develop evidence-based interventions and set sustainable extraction and pollution limits.

Dr. Kilimani also emphasized ecosystem accounting, which captures the benefits of natural systems beyond direct economic output. Forests, rivers, and urban parks provide services such as recreation, water purification, disease regulation, and stress relief. “These services contribute to human well-being and quality of life, even if they are not directly traded in the market,” he explained.

He stressed that understanding and communicating these services is crucial when interacting with policymakers and community leaders, including mayors and district officials, to ensure that development decisions do not compromise environmental integrity.

Concluding his presentation, Dr. Kilimani urged environmental officers to strengthen their monitoring and reporting systems, emphasizing that accountability and proper documentation are essential. “You are the gatekeepers of Uganda’s natural wealth. Proper environmental accounting ensures that resources are used sustainably, benefiting both the economy and the people,” he said.

He further emphasized that environmental protection and development must go hand in hand, warning that neglecting natural resources today could lead to irreversible losses tomorrow.

Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: Practical Solutions Urged for Districts

Climate change is no longer a distant threat, but a reality already affecting Uganda, with unpredictable rains, crop failures, floods, and droughts impacting communities, says Alice Nalweera, an environmental expert.

Speaking to district officers, Nalweera emphasized the need for practical action in policies, plans and budgets to address both the causes and effects of climate change. “We are already experiencing the impacts. Delayed rains, extreme heat, and changing planting seasons are clear signs that climate change is here,” she said.

Nalweera distinguished between weather – the short-term state of the atmosphere and climate, which refers to long-term patterns over at least 30 years. She cited local experiences in districts such as Bulisa, where traditional planting indicators have become unreliable due to shifting rainfall patterns.

Human activities, including deforestation, industrialization, methane emissions from livestock, transport, and resource extraction, have compounded natural factors, contributing to rising temperatures, land degradation, loss of biodiversity, food insecurity, and increased vulnerability to diseases.

Mitigation and Adaptation Approaches

To address climate change, Nalweera outlined two main strategies. Mitigation tackles the root causes by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving forests, creating carbon sinks, and promoting energy-efficient technologies while Adaptation focuses on adjusting to the impacts, including the use of drought-resistant crops, resilient infrastructure, early warning systems for disasters and climate-smart agriculture.

“Uganda is moving toward adaptation because climate change is already a reality. Adaptation reduces vulnerability, enhances resilience, and supports sustainable livelihoods,” she said.

Nalweera highlighted climate-smart agriculture as a key tool for both adaptation and mitigation. Techniques such as agroforestry, improved composting, energy recovery from waste, and drought-resistant crops help communities maintain productivity while reducing environmental impact.

“Through climate-smart agriculture, farmers can increase productivity, protect the environment, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve household incomes,” she said.

The session concluded with participatory exercises, where officers were encouraged to reflect on climate changes in their districts, identify local adaptation measures, and propose policy interventions. Nalweera stressed the importance of integrating climate risks into district development plans to ensure that communities are prepared for both current and future impacts of climate change.

“Adaptation and mitigation must go hand in hand. Practical solutions, community engagement and informed policy decisions are key to safeguarding livelihoods, enhancing resilience, and promoting sustainable development,” she said.

District Officers Laud Training

District environmental officers praised the training highlighting the relevance of the training to their day-to-day responsibilities and the need to integrate environmental considerations into district development planning.

Nakayenze Anna, Head of Natural Resources in Mbale District, noted, “This training has been very beneficial. It has highlighted the government’s commitment to integrating environmental reporting into our frameworks. For local governments, we now understand the importance of having the right data to inform reporting and service delivery. The challenge, however, remains in building capacity to collect and manage such data across sectors. This training is an opportunity to rethink our structures and strengthen environmental management at the district level.”

Similarly, Maganda Moses, Principal Environment Officer from  Jinja District, emphasized the need to attach economic value to natural resources. “We have forests, wetlands, and Lake Victoria, but for a long time, we haven’t attached economic value to these resources. This training has shown us the importance of valuing natural resources to convince policymakers and funders to support their protection. Local governments must step forward to mobilize resources to safeguard these critical assets,” he said.

In Kapchorwa District, Chelimo Salim, Environmental officer, reflected on applying the knowledge in the field. “We have learned about environmental evaluation, valuation, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. I will take this knowledge back to Kapchorwa to encourage communities to conserve the environment, plant trees and protect wetlands,” he said.

Florence, District Environment Officer in Iganga, also appreciated the practical approach of the training. “I have learned more about adaptation responses to climate change. The training was very appropriate, though I wish it could have been a little longer to allow more in-depth learning,” she said.

Edwin Masheta, a Planner in Iganga District, added that the training clarified the distinction between weather and climate. “Communities often confuse weather with climate change. This training has given me a long-term perspective, particularly on mitigation and adaptation measures. While adaptive behaviors are still limited in many communities, I believe initiatives like this will drive meaningful change at the local level,” he said.

Participants agreed that the training will inform their future planning and implementation of environmental policies, emphasizing the need for more structured capacity-building initiatives to strengthen local government roles in environmental governance.

End